Securing a shared adsl connection

Hi,

I would like to know it is possible to have access to a computer on a shared
connection via a ADSL modem router. FYI no work group has been set.

Wiseman

From: "Wiseman" <(E-Mail Removed)>

| Hi,
|
| I would like to know it is possible to have access to a computer on a shared
| connection via a ADSL modem router. FYI no work group has been set.
|
| Wiseman
|

Please be more specific on what you are asking.
What are you trying to accomplish ?

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

I am sharing my connection with a neighbour and I want to make sure they
can't have access to my pc, that's all.


"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> a écrit dans le message de
news: 5%SIj.9822$bC6.3537@trnddc08...
> From: "Wiseman" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | I would like to know it is possible to have access to a computer on a
> shared
> | connection via a ADSL modem router. FYI no work group has been set.
> |
> | Wiseman
> |
>
> Please be more specific on what you are asking.
> What are you trying to accomplish ?
>
> --
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
>
>

From: "Wiseman" <(E-Mail Removed)>

| I am sharing my connection with a neighbour and I want to make sure they
| can't have access to my pc, that's all.
|

All I can say is -- Don't!

You are responsible for their actions.


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

Try to be more specific. I need to share because the cost is high.

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> a écrit dans le message de
news: AG2Jj.9676$s27.6596@trnddc02...
> From: "Wiseman" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>
> | I am sharing my connection with a neighbour and I want to make sure they
> | can't have access to my pc, that's all.
>
> All I can say is -- Don't!
>
> You are responsible for their actions.
>
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

From: "Wiseman" <(E-Mail Removed)>

| Try to be more specific. I need to share because the cost is high.
|

Pay for it or don't access the Internet. There are too many risks sharing Internet with
non-family members.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

On 2008-04-04 07:38:51, David H. Lipman wrote:

> From: "Wiseman" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>
>| Try to be more specific. I need to share because the cost is high.

I think what he's trying to say is that if anyone is doing anything illegal
over the connection, the one responsible for the connection may be held
responsible.

> Pay for it or don't access the Internet. There are too many risks
> sharing Internet with non-family members.

I don't really see how the "family member" qualifier changes anything of
that -- if it is about that. IMO the risk is about the same for family
members and non-family members (at least without knowing details about the
specific persons involved).

Gerhard

I appreciate your explanation.

But my question was not about what the neighbour can do on the internet. It
was whether they could access my own computer.

"Gerhard Fiedler" <(E-Mail Removed)> a écrit dans le message de news:
oekubd95kn6j$.(E-Mail Removed)...
> On 2008-04-04 07:38:51, David H. Lipman wrote:
>
>> From: "Wiseman" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>
>>| Try to be more specific. I need to share because the cost is high.
>
> I think what he's trying to say is that if anyone is doing anything
> illegal
> over the connection, the one responsible for the connection may be held
> responsible.
>
>> Pay for it or don't access the Internet. There are too many risks
>> sharing Internet with non-family members.
>
> I don't really see how the "family member" qualifier changes anything of
> that -- if it is about that. IMO the risk is about the same for family
> members and non-family members (at least without knowing details about the
> specific persons involved).
>
> Gerhard

From: "Gerhard Fiedler" <(E-Mail Removed)>

| On 2008-04-04 07:38:51, David H. Lipman wrote:
|
>> From: "Wiseman" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>
>|> Try to be more specific. I need to share because the cost is high.
|
| I think what he's trying to say is that if anyone is doing anything illegal
| over the connection, the one responsible for the connection may be held
| responsible.
|
>> Pay for it or don't access the Internet. There are too many risks
>> sharing Internet with non-family members.
|
| I don't really see how the "family member" qualifier changes anything of
| that -- if it is about that. IMO the risk is about the same for family
| members and non-family members (at least without knowing details about the
| specific persons involved).
|
| Gerhard

Actually you find this as a clause on most if not all ISP ToS/AUP's.


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

I have done this.
I had a router at each house and set internal network set for two
different ranges.

Wiseman wrote:
> I appreciate your explanation.
>
> But my question was not about what the neighbour can do on the internet. It
> was whether they could access my own computer.
>
> "Gerhard Fiedler" <(E-Mail Removed)> a écrit dans le message de news:
> oekubd95kn6j$.(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On 2008-04-04 07:38:51, David H. Lipman wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Wiseman" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>>
>>> | Try to be more specific. I need to share because the cost is high.
>> I think what he's trying to say is that if anyone is doing anything
>> illegal
>> over the connection, the one responsible for the connection may be held
>> responsible.
>>
>>> Pay for it or don't access the Internet. There are too many risks
>>> sharing Internet with non-family members.
>> I don't really see how the "family member" qualifier changes anything of
>> that -- if it is about that. IMO the risk is about the same for family
>> members and non-family members (at least without knowing details about the
>> specific persons involved).
>>
>> Gerhard
>
>