say no to wi fi

An interesting story about wi fi's detrimental health effects:

http://prd34.blogspot.com/2007/03/ou...-son-sick.html

Dear Ms. XXX,

My son has been having serious ailments over the last 6 months including: Severe and constant headaches, leg pains, poor sleep, and even heart palpitations. Various specialists were at a loss as to why he had these conditions! The only thing that showed up in extensive bloodwork was a low IgA level. I did some research and figured out that it may be the WiFi Wireless Internet I installed in our home exactly 6 months prior.

So I quietly unhooked the system, and monitored my son so not to tell him of my changes. Sure enough, within hours his headache that he had without pause for 6 months went away. We're about 2 weeks from when I first disabled the WiFi system and my sons ENTIRE medical symptom list has complete cleared up! No longer does he complain of sore legs or headaches, which is a big relief to us.

Most importantly, his blood panel showed that his IgA levels returned to normal. Upon investigation I found that EMF/EMR from Wireless Networks can lower Melatonin, which indirectly lowers IgA - there are studies that confirm this. IgA itself is responsible for fighting a VARIETY of illness. So we can say indirectly that EMF/EMR may be responsible for an extremely wide range of human ailments.

Lenny wrote:
> An interesting story about wi fi's detrimental health effects:
>
> http://prd34.spamsnot.com/2007/03/ou...-son-sick.html
>
> Dear Ms. XXX,
>
> My son has been having serious ailments over the last 6 months including: Severe and constant headaches, leg pains, poor sleep, and even heart palpitations.

HE'LL BE DEAD BY MORNING.


--
xCx
*Disclaimer* My opinions are mine and I do not represent
anyone or any company.

"Lenny" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:f7spdq$sov$(E-Mail Removed)...
> An interesting story about wi fi's detrimental health effects:
>
> http://prd34.blogspot.com/2007/03/ou...-son-sick.html
>
> Dear Ms. XXX,
>
> My son has been having serious ailments over the last 6 months including:
> Severe and constant headaches, leg pains, poor sleep, and even heart
> palpitations. Various specialists were at a loss as to why he had these
> conditions! The only thing that showed up in extensive bloodwork was a low
> IgA level. I did some research and figured out that it may be the WiFi
> Wireless Internet I installed in our home exactly 6 months prior.
>
> So I quietly unhooked the system, and monitored my son so not to tell him
> of my changes. Sure enough, within hours his headache that he had without
> pause for 6 months went away. We're about 2 weeks from when I first
> disabled the WiFi system and my sons ENTIRE medical symptom list has
> complete cleared up! No longer does he complain of sore legs or headaches,
> which is a big relief to us.
>
> Most importantly, his blood panel showed that his IgA levels returned to
> normal. Upon investigation I found that EMF/EMR from Wireless Networks can
> lower Melatonin, which indirectly lowers IgA - there are studies that
> confirm this. IgA itself is responsible for fighting a VARIETY of illness.
> So we can say indirectly that EMF/EMR may be responsible for an extremely
> wide range of human ailments.
>






once you unplugged the wifi he couldnt look at porn anymore - he was no
longer able to wank himself into a stupor and quickly recovered.




--
Gareth.

That fly... is your magic wand.
http://www.last.fm/user/dsbmusic/

Lenny wrote:

> An interesting story about wi fi's detrimental health effects:

Get back to us when there's some science to explain it.

Graham

"Eeyore" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>
> Lenny wrote:
>
>> An interesting story about wi fi's detrimental health effects:
>
> Get back to us when there's some science to explain it.

There is plenty of real scientific proof.. just Google for placebo or
lawsuit against wireless provider if you want the real reason.

"dennis@home" wrote:

> "Eeyore" wrote
> > Lenny wrote:
> >
> >> An interesting story about wi fi's detrimental health effects:
> >
> > Get back to us when there's some science to explain it.
>
> There is plenty of real scientific proof.. just Google for placebo or
> lawsuit against wireless provider if you want the real reason.

Just because ppl *think* wi-fi is to blame and start a lawsuit doesn't make it
science.

And why wi-fi especially ? We live in an 'electronic soup' of emissions from kit
these days. And why are the vast majority of ppl totally unaffected ?

Graham

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:28:12 +0100, Eeyore
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
>
>"dennis@home" wrote:
>
>> "Eeyore" wrote
>> > Lenny wrote:
>> >
>> >> An interesting story about wi fi's detrimental health effects:
>> >
>> > Get back to us when there's some science to explain it.
>>
>> There is plenty of real scientific proof.. just Google for placebo or
>> lawsuit against wireless provider if you want the real reason.
>
>Just because ppl *think* wi-fi is to blame and start a lawsuit doesn't make it
>science.
>
>And why wi-fi especially ? We live in an 'electronic soup' of emissions from kit
>these days. And why are the vast majority of ppl totally unaffected ?
>
>Graham
>

And what about the megawatts of UHF TV that many of us have been
subjected to for nearly 40 years?

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:19:04 +0100, Digby wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:28:12 +0100, Eeyore
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>"dennis@home" wrote:
>>
>>> "Eeyore" wrote
>>> > Lenny wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> An interesting story about wi fi's detrimental health effects:
>>> >
>>> > Get back to us when there's some science to explain it.
>>>
>>> There is plenty of real scientific proof.. just Google for placebo or
>>> lawsuit against wireless provider if you want the real reason.
>>
>>Just because ppl *think* wi-fi is to blame and start a lawsuit doesn't
>>make it science.
>>
>>And why wi-fi especially ? We live in an 'electronic soup' of emissions
>>from kit these days. And why are the vast majority of ppl totally
>>unaffected ?
>>
>>Graham
>>
>>
> And what about the megawatts of UHF TV that many of us have been subjected
> to for nearly 40 years?

You mean about 10 millivolts/metre.

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:29:07 +0100, in uk.telecom.broadband , Lenny
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:19:04 +0100, Digby wrote:
>
>>>
>> And what about the megawatts of UHF TV that many of us have been subjected
>> to for nearly 40 years?
>
>You mean about 10 millivolts/metre.

Hm? Why not measure it in barns per ell, it'd be more meaningful.
--
Mark McIntyre

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:29:07 +0100, Lenny <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:19:04 +0100, Digby wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:28:12 +0100, Eeyore
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>"dennis@home" wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Eeyore" wrote
>>>> > Lenny wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> An interesting story about wi fi's detrimental health effects:
>>>> >
>>>> > Get back to us when there's some science to explain it.
>>>>
>>>> There is plenty of real scientific proof.. just Google for placebo or
>>>> lawsuit against wireless provider if you want the real reason.
>>>
>>>Just because ppl *think* wi-fi is to blame and start a lawsuit doesn't
>>>make it science.
>>>
>>>And why wi-fi especially ? We live in an 'electronic soup' of emissions
>>>from kit these days. And why are the vast majority of ppl totally
>>>unaffected ?
>>>
>>>Graham
>>>
>>>
>> And what about the megawatts of UHF TV that many of us have been subjected
>> to for nearly 40 years?
>
>You mean about 10 millivolts/metre.
>
>

What is that supposed to mean! I meant from UHF TV transmitters, there
must have been millions of people subjected to UHF 'radiation' from
Crystal Palace, Sutton Coldfield etc. for all those years. Similar in
frequency to many mobile phone masts.