Rundll Error

Rundll

Error loading C:\progra~1\newdot~\newdot~2.dll
The system cannot find the file specified

*I get this error everytime I turn on the computer

You appear to have allowed a commercial parasite to be installed. That
you system cannot find C:\progra~1\newdot~\newdot~2.dll could be a good
thing and mean that you have partially removed this parasite and all that
remains is to remove the entry in the registry that is attempting to
launch it each time you boot your PC. You can do that my using MSConfig
(Start, Run, enter MSConfig in the box and click OK), open the Startup tab
and uncheck all entries that refer to C:\progra~1\newdot~\newdot~2.dll

This is intrusive scumware that does little more than cripple your
browsing. Add/Remove Programs and remove New.net. Once you have done that
go to LavaSoft's site (http://www.lavasoftusa.com/software/adaware/) and
get yourself a copy of the free Ad-Aware SE Personal edition and run it
and/or SpyBot Search & Destroy 1.3 (http://www.safer-networking.org/) and
perhaps also BHO Demon and rid yourself of this odious junk and other
similar parasites that do nothing to enhance your use of your computer.
See also http://www.doxdesk.com/parasite/NewDotNet.html

Some details are contained in MS KB 320162 - "Internet Explorer Stops
Responding or the Home Page Takes a Long Time to Open"
(http://support.microsoft.com?kbid=320162) and also 302463 - "Error
Message: Iexplore Caused an Invalid Page Fault in Module Unknown with
SaveNow or New.net Installed" (http://support.microsoft.com?kbid=302463).

Note that in a few hours a NewCr$pNet representative may post more of
their lies to this thread. My advice is to ignore them, they are
interested in nothing more than peddling their unwelcome software on
unsuspecting users. If the net community and ICANN had wanted the top
level domains sold by Cr$pnet then ICANN would have set them up
accordingly but they didn't so NewCr$p decide instead to break with
internet standards and meddle with your PC and wreck your browsing. IMO
such companies and all those involved in them should be taken to court and
prosecuted for their unwelcome intrusions.
--
Mike Maltby
(E-Mail Removed)


Rita <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> Rundll
>
> Error loading C:\progra~1\newdot~\newdot~2.dll
> The system cannot find the file specified
>
> *I get this error everytime I turn on the computer

For accurate information and uninstall instructions, please visit
http://www.newdotnet.info.

Customer Support
New.net, Inc.

"Rita" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<620201c492ed$0f423c40$(E-Mail Removed)>...
> Rundll
>
> Error loading C:\progra~1\newdot~\newdot~2.dll
> The system cannot find the file specified
>
> *I get this error everytime I turn on the computer

You and the company you work for wouldn't know "accurate" or "truth" if it
hit you on the head or your life depended on it.
--
Mike Maltby MS-MVP
(E-Mail Removed)


New.net Lack of Support <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> For spin and lies please don't visit http://www.newcrapnet.info.

You should probably go back and read those MSKB articles that you
reference regarding our software and especially double check the
applications that you refer users to remove our software with.
Adaware and SpyBot no longer target our software. New.net is a member
of C.O.A.S.T and have proven countless times that our software is not
a parasite, adware, spyware, or any other reference that you choose to
use.

Your instructions do no help users and I suggest that you simply refer
them to our removal instructions.

Customer Support
New.net, Inc.

"Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
> You and the company you work for wouldn't know "accurate" or "truth" if it
> hit you on the head or your life depended on it.

I have no interest in the crap you put out other than to try and ensure
that those poor users whose systems you destroy learn what a disreputable
individuals you and your colleagues are and that the company you work for
should be wiped out of existence. Is that clear enough for even your
feeble and warped intellect to understand?

Your continual lies and mis-information do nothing to inspire any
confidence in any poor sucker whose PC you infect with your malware.
UseNet has NO need for the false domains you purvey. That you have forced
SpyBot and AdAware to no longer detect your crap is no doubt simply the
result of your lawyers gagging them.

Your software causes totally unnecessary problems and the WWW has zero
need for the crap your company purveys.
--
Mike Maltby MS-MVP [2001-2004]
(E-Mail Removed)


Crap.netCustomer Support <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> You should probably go back and read those MSKB articles that you
> reference regarding our software and especially double check the
> applications that you refer users to remove our software with.
> Adaware and SpyBot no longer target our software. New.net is a member
> of C.O.A.S.T and have proven countless times that our software is not
> a parasite, adware, spyware, or any other reference that you choose to
> use.
>
> Your instructions do no help users and I suggest that you simply refer
> them to our removal instructions.

I can tell you that no customer of mine has ever knowingly or willingly
installed new.net and I doubt sincerely that a company representative from
new.net would care enough to help people whose machines are infected with
their software. Not once has a single one out of my 500+ database of
customers ever asked for, requested or otherwise indicated the need or
desire or purpose of new.net.

There are several Winsock Repair tools available that repair the damage to
the TCP/IP stack that new.net offers.

Finally, if this person truly is an official representative of new.net, why
are they using an anonymous and free Gmail account? I think this is just a
troll looking to yank people's chains, or just another example of the
questionable practices new.net participates in.

Carey


"New.net Customer Support" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) om...
> You should probably go back and read those MSKB articles that you
> reference regarding our software and especially double check the
> applications that you refer users to remove our software with.
> Adaware and SpyBot no longer target our software. New.net is a member
> of C.O.A.S.T and have proven countless times that our software is not
> a parasite, adware, spyware, or any other reference that you choose to
> use.
>
> Your instructions do no help users and I suggest that you simply refer
> them to our removal instructions.
>
> Customer Support
> New.net, Inc.
>
> "Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message
> news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
>> You and the company you work for wouldn't know "accurate" or "truth" if
>> it
>> hit you on the head or your life depended on it.

Nah, that's the way they do business here. Post from an anonymous account
(or at least one that's not connected to their real business). Been that
way since they started occasionally trolling the newsgroups and replying to
the 'evil naysayers' who disparage their software.

--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Win9x] (E-Mail Removed)
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to.
* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm


"Carey Holzman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>I can tell you that no customer of mine has ever knowingly or willingly
>installed new.net and I doubt sincerely that a company representative from
>new.net would care enough to help people whose machines are infected with
>their software. Not once has a single one out of my 500+ database of
>customers ever asked for, requested or otherwise indicated the need or
>desire or purpose of new.net.
>
> There are several Winsock Repair tools available that repair the damage to
> the TCP/IP stack that new.net offers.
>
> Finally, if this person truly is an official representative of new.net,
> why are they using an anonymous and free Gmail account? I think this is
> just a troll looking to yank people's chains, or just another example of
> the questionable practices new.net participates in.
>
> Carey
>
>
> "New.net Customer Support" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed) om...
>> You should probably go back and read those MSKB articles that you
>> reference regarding our software and especially double check the
>> applications that you refer users to remove our software with.
>> Adaware and SpyBot no longer target our software. New.net is a member
>> of C.O.A.S.T and have proven countless times that our software is not
>> a parasite, adware, spyware, or any other reference that you choose to
>> use.
>>
>> Your instructions do no help users and I suggest that you simply refer
>> them to our removal instructions.
>>
>> Customer Support
>> New.net, Inc.
>>
>> "Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message
>> news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
>>> You and the company you work for wouldn't know "accurate" or "truth" if
>>> it
>>> hit you on the head or your life depended on it.
>
>

I'd love to see some class-action litigation against new.net to hold them
responsible for the cost of repairs that people are forced to undertake when
new.net does not uninstall properly or when the end-user does not "remove it
properly."

I can tell you from my experience and the amount I have billed to re-instate
internet connectivity, that my billing alone over the last few years fixing
the damage resulting from a new.net installation would be a 5 figure number.

New IP addresses are the main reason for IPv6, which makes new.net's excuses
and entire purpose for existence (by their own definition) obsolete.

http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2004...n-08-30-04.asp

http://www.ipv6.org/


"Richard G. Harper" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Nah, that's the way they do business here. Post from an anonymous account
> (or at least one that's not connected to their real business). Been that
> way since they started occasionally trolling the newsgroups and replying
> to the 'evil naysayers' who disparage their software.
>
> --
> Richard G. Harper [MVP Win9x] (E-Mail Removed)
> * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
> * for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to.
> * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
>
>
> "Carey Holzman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I can tell you that no customer of mine has ever knowingly or willingly
>>installed new.net and I doubt sincerely that a company representative from
>>new.net would care enough to help people whose machines are infected with
>>their software. Not once has a single one out of my 500+ database of
>>customers ever asked for, requested or otherwise indicated the need or
>>desire or purpose of new.net.
>>
>> There are several Winsock Repair tools available that repair the damage
>> to the TCP/IP stack that new.net offers.
>>
>> Finally, if this person truly is an official representative of new.net,
>> why are they using an anonymous and free Gmail account? I think this is
>> just a troll looking to yank people's chains, or just another example of
>> the questionable practices new.net participates in.
>>
>> Carey
>>
>>
>> "New.net Customer Support" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed) om...
>>> You should probably go back and read those MSKB articles that you
>>> reference regarding our software and especially double check the
>>> applications that you refer users to remove our software with.
>>> Adaware and SpyBot no longer target our software. New.net is a member
>>> of C.O.A.S.T and have proven countless times that our software is not
>>> a parasite, adware, spyware, or any other reference that you choose to
>>> use.
>>>
>>> Your instructions do no help users and I suggest that you simply refer
>>> them to our removal instructions.
>>>
>>> Customer Support
>>> New.net, Inc.
>>>
>>> "Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message
>>> news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
>>>> You and the company you work for wouldn't know "accurate" or "truth" if
>>>> it
>>>> hit you on the head or your life depended on it.
>>
>>
>
>

Carey Holzman wrote:

> I'd love to see some class-action litigation against new.net to hold them
> responsible for the cost of repairs that people are forced to undertake when
> new.net does not uninstall properly or when the end-user does not "remove it
> properly."
>
> I can tell you from my experience and the amount I have billed to re-instate
> internet connectivity, that my billing alone over the last few years fixing
> the damage resulting from a new.net installation would be a 5 figure number.
>
> New IP addresses are the main reason for IPv6, which makes new.net's excuses
> and entire purpose for existence (by their own definition) obsolete.
>
> http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2004...n-08-30-04.asp
>
> http://www.ipv6.org/
>
>
> "Richard G. Harper" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>>Nah, that's the way they do business here. Post from an anonymous account
>>(or at least one that's not connected to their real business). Been that
>>way since they started occasionally trolling the newsgroups and replying
>>to the 'evil naysayers' who disparage their software.
>>
>>--
>>Richard G. Harper [MVP Win9x] (E-Mail Removed)
>>* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
>>* for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to.
>>* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
>>
>>
>>"Carey Holzman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:%(E-Mail Removed).. .
>>
>>>I can tell you that no customer of mine has ever knowingly or willingly
>>>installed new.net and I doubt sincerely that a company representative from
>>>new.net would care enough to help people whose machines are infected with
>>>their software. Not once has a single one out of my 500+ database of
>>>customers ever asked for, requested or otherwise indicated the need or
>>>desire or purpose of new.net.
>>>
>>>There are several Winsock Repair tools available that repair the damage
>>>to the TCP/IP stack that new.net offers.
>>>
>>>Finally, if this person truly is an official representative of new.net,
>>>why are they using an anonymous and free Gmail account? I think this is
>>>just a troll looking to yank people's chains, or just another example of
>>>the questionable practices new.net participates in.
>>>
>>>Carey
>>>
>>>
>>>"New.net Customer Support" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>news:(E-Mail Removed) e.com...
>>>
>>>>You should probably go back and read those MSKB articles that you
>>>>reference regarding our software and especially double check the
>>>>applications that you refer users to remove our software with.
>>>>Adaware and SpyBot no longer target our software. New.net is a member
>>>>of C.O.A.S.T and have proven countless times that our software is not
>>>>a parasite, adware, spyware, or any other reference that you choose to
>>>>use.
>>>>
>>>>Your instructions do no help users and I suggest that you simply refer
>>>>them to our removal instructions.
>>>>
>>>>Customer Support
>>>>New.net, Inc.
>>>>
>>>>"Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message
>>>>news:<(E-Mail Removed)>.. .
>>>>
>>>>>You and the company you work for wouldn't know "accurate" or "truth" if
>>>>>it
>>>>>hit you on the head or your life depended on it.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
1. you are not new.net customer support (you dont have a new.net email
address for this acct)
2. i would see new.net as beeing "spyware", so would most other users as
soon as they know what this piece of "unwanted trash" does.

Grtz,
Romenski