"Bill Grant" wrote:
>
>
> "markm75" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:30625F49-1B0E-47E3-8A60-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> >> You should be able to do that over the existing connection. If you
> >> have
> >> a VPN connection from the remote server to a VPN server on your LAN, you
> >> have an IP connection between the remote server and any machine on your
> >> LAN
> >> (when the connection is up).
> >>
> >> When your VPN clients connect by VPN, can they see all machines on
> >> the
> >> LAN? If not, what is it for? When the remote server connects, cannot it
> >> see
> >> all the machines on the LAN?
> >>
> >> If you cannot connect from a LAN machine to a remote machine (which
> >> is
> >> connected by VPN) it is probably because of name resolution or
> >> authentication problems. It should not be a routing problem or a firewall
> >> problem.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Well.. i can ping the remote server by ip address but from ONLY the RRAS
> > local LAN server (and cant get to any shared mappings etc, via ip
> > address)..
> >
> > Attempts to ping this ip from any other LAN machine dont result in ping
> > backs, for some reason.
>
> Does this server use the VPN server as its default gateway? If not, you
> will need a static route on it to get traffic for the "other" private subnet
> to the VPN router. Otherwise it will try across the Internet unencrypted and
> unencapsulated.
>
> Can your dial-in VPN clients see this server?
> >
>
By your question of if the server uses the default gateway, you mean the
remote server correct? I had unchecked that option.. the reason being, at
least on regular desktops i found that if we had that checked, those remote
machines internet connections max download would become the upload max of our
LAN's gateway router.. by unchecking it, they would have full speed of their
own internet connection..
In setting up a static route.. i could set a static route on our sonicwall
lan gateway (?).. or does it have to be the RRAS server for pptp 2 way to
work.. but i have to set the same static route on the other end correct (the
remote server)? We dont have access to a firewall there, so does this imply
i'd need to install RRAS on that remote box (nervous about doing this, as
once in the past i did this and hosed a server, but at least then i had
physical access

)
I'm guessing i'd have to enter the static route on the lan side (sonicwall
or rras) of the remote lan.. ie: 192.168.1.0 and on the remote server's
setting.. the lan gateway 192.168.100.0 etc?