Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Linux Networking > rp-pppoe 3.5 & poor performance

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

rp-pppoe 3.5 & poor performance

 
 
Randy Cooper
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-19-2003, 11:40 AM
Hi,

I have set up a Linux system as a firewall.

I have been trying to figure out why I have slow response from web sites to my Linux systems behind the firewall. Often a page will never completely load. e-mail and newsgroups seem to work ok.

I am using Roaoring Penguin pppoe v 3.5 under Slackware 9.0 on the firewall. I have followed all of the suggestions in the documentation without any success.

Is anyone aware of any gotcha's of which I should be aware?

Is there an alternative to rp-pppoe with which someone has had success?

Thanks,
Randy
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
David Efflandt
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-20-2003, 05:46 PM
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 06:40:46 -0500, Randy Cooper <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> I have set up a Linux system as a firewall.
>
> I have been trying to figure out why I have slow response from web sites
> to my Linux systems behind the firewall. Often a page will never
> completely load. e-mail and newsgroups seem to work ok.
>
> I am using Roaoring Penguin pppoe v 3.5 under Slackware 9.0 on the
> firewall. I have followed all of the suggestions in the documentation
> without any success.
>
> Is anyone aware of any gotcha's of which I should be aware?
>
> Is there an alternative to rp-pppoe with which someone has had success?


Make sure you are not using rp-pppoe synchronous option (maybe that is for
sdsl). Using that option for adsl caused errors in ifconfig (but no
noticeable slow down). If you use a graphical interface like tk-pppoe,
that can eat cpu time (I think 20-30% on K6-2/400).

Kernel pppoe uses less resources (no noticeable cpu time), but I am not
sure how to configure it, because SuSE makes it all too easy.

Are any internet file sharing programs running on your LAN? If your
upload becomes saturated, that can choke your download (acknowledgements
for received packets have to wait in line in upload queue).

--
David Efflandt - All spam ignored http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
 
Reply With Quote
 
Randy Cooper
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-20-2003, 09:36 PM
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:46:17 +0000 (UTC)
(E-Mail Removed) (David Efflandt) wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 06:40:46 -0500, Randy Cooper <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > I have set up a Linux system as a firewall.
> >
> > I have been trying to figure out why I have slow response from web sites
> > to my Linux systems behind the firewall. Often a page will never
> > completely load. e-mail and newsgroups seem to work ok.
> >
> > I am using Roaoring Penguin pppoe v 3.5 under Slackware 9.0 on the
> > firewall. I have followed all of the suggestions in the documentation
> > without any success.
> >
> > Is anyone aware of any gotcha's of which I should be aware?
> >
> > Is there an alternative to rp-pppoe with which someone has had success?

>
> Make sure you are not using rp-pppoe synchronous option (maybe that is for
> sdsl). Using that option for adsl caused errors in ifconfig (but no
> noticeable slow down). If you use a graphical interface like tk-pppoe,
> that can eat cpu time (I think 20-30% on K6-2/400).
>
> Kernel pppoe uses less resources (no noticeable cpu time), but I am not
> sure how to configure it, because SuSE makes it all too easy.
>
> Are any internet file sharing programs running on your LAN? If your
> upload becomes saturated, that can choke your download (acknowledgements
> for received packets have to wait in line in upload queue).
>
> --
> David Efflandt - All spam ignored http://www.de-srv.com/
> http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
> http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/


Thanks, but I am not using the rp-pppoe synchronous option. There is no other traffic on the LAN. I am testing using only two computers. One is the firewall and the other is the system I'm experiencing the problems on. No othere services are running.

I'm wondering if the problem could be the NetGear FA-311 NIC I am using to connect to my ADSL modem. mii-tool should the connection as 10BaseT-HD, which I believe is correct.

Randy
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor Performance Ernie Windows Networking 4 08-30-2006 02:20 PM
Poor adsl performance Paul Broadband 6 02-07-2006 08:33 AM
Poor network performance Martin P Windows Networking 5 08-19-2004 07:20 PM
NLB poor network performance Geo Windows Networking 0 07-09-2004 10:07 AM
D-Link DWL-520 poor performance? Captain Dondo Wireless Internet 4 07-09-2003 03:38 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11