Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > rf warnings given

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

rf warnings given

 
 
Lenny
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-22-2007, 07:55 AM
Quote:
DECT Cordless Baby Monitors - Offical warning on DECT phones: Alarms 'pose danger'
Sent by Sylvie:

http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20...y_monitors.asp

News: 22/02/2006 - Digital Cordless Baby Monitors - Our Experiences

Summary: Over the past five years we, with the help of parents, have measured a variety of baby monitors and the DECT pulsing ones seem to be far more disruptive of the infant˙s sleep and state of contentment (causing restlessness, irritability and crying). The old wired ones and the older ´analogueˇ cordless ones do not seem to cause the same problems if kept at least one metre from the cot / bed.

We have had a number of reports from parents that their babies did not sleep well and cried a lot when they used DECT monitors but were ok when no baby monitor was used. When they then tried a cheaper analogue monitor, the infant then slept as well as they did with no monitor.

A DECT monitor places in your baby˙s bedroom will expose them to more pulsing microwave radiation that living near to a mobile phone base station mast would do. As a result, whilst there have been no studies done into baby monitors specifically, studies that cover mobile phone masts provide a good background to the effects that would be expected in your baby.

To find out more, we have a more detailed article in the subscriber part of this website (under Electrical Appliances).

Source: http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/index.php?p=395

--------

DIGITAL BABY MONITORS 'RAISE RISK OF CANCER'
BY JAMES MILLS
20 February 2006
Daily Mail

(c) 2006 Associated Newspapers. All rights reserved

CHILDREN may be at risk of cancer from digital baby monitors, parents have been warned.

The cordless gadgets, which allow babies' breathing patterns to be checked from another room, emit potentially dangerous radio waves even when not in use.

Consumer group Powerwatch warned parents against using them after research suggested the technology increased the risk of brain tumours.

There are also fears it is linked with leukaemia, breast cancer, headaches and disturbed behaviour patterns in children.

Digitally enhanced cordless technology is becoming more popular in baby monitors. But Powerwatch founder, Alasdair Philips, said: 'This technology poses a risk to everyone, but babies in particular should not be exposed to it at all.

'Babies are more likely to be effected because their cells are rapidly dividing as they grow and can be more easily damaged.'

Similar concerns have been expressed about cordless phones.

Last week, research found those who used digital mobiles or cordless phones had a higher chance of getting a benign tumour called acoustic neuroma, though similar studies have found no link.

Dr Michael Clark, of the Health Protection Agency, said he would be surprised if digital baby monitors and base units of cordless phones caused cancer because their electromagnetic fields operate at low levels and the devices are not held against the head.


Headline:
Baby alarm; Exclusive Byline: Robbie Collin Source: News of the World Issue Date: Sunday February 19, 2006 Page: 39
PERIL: Alarms 'pose danger'
Story Text:

'Monitors give off deadly radiation'

BABIES are being put at risk of cancer by hi-tech cot monitors which emit deadly radiation, it is claimed.

Parents will be horrified to learn that slow-pulsing microwaves blasted out by modern digital equipment may cause leukaemia, say scientists.

Lab tests have also linked the radiation to potentially fatal brain tumours, breast cancer, headaches and disturbed behaviour patterns in kids.

Consumer group Powerwatch has urged parents to ditch digital (DECT) monitors.

Boss Alasdair Philips said: "We don't recommend they are used. Do not put a wireless transmitter in your child's bedroom and irradiate them unnecessarily."

Emissions, even if the monitor is not in use, can reportedly reach six volts per metre-TWICE as strong as those found within 100 metres of mobile phone masts.

That's a similar amount given off by digital cordless phones, as we revealed this month.

Baby monitoring mats-which check a tot's temperature and breathing-are also a concern because it is claimed they can emit 120 TIMES the safe level of 0.05 volts per metre.

Digital products produce the radiation-but are popular because they provide clearer sound than old analogue monitors.

Expert Dr David Dowson said: "Until more research has been done, I would advise every parent not to use them."

One manufacturer said: "There's no scientific evidence linking radiowaves to symptoms."

Omega this is not true. See under:
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Wisse...+zu+Mobilfunk/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cancer+Cluster
http://www.buergerwelle.de/body_science.html
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
dennis@home
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-22-2007, 08:16 AM

"Lenny" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:f2u7ln$qga$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Quote:
> DECT Cordless Baby Monitors - Offical warning on DECT phones: Alarms 'pose
> danger'
> Sent by Sylvie:
>
> http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20...y_monitors.asp
>
> News: 22/02/2006 - Digital Cordless Baby Monitors - Our Experiences
>
> Summary: Over the past five years we, with the help of parents, have
> measured a variety of baby monitors and the DECT pulsing ones seem to be
> far more disruptive of the infant˙s sleep and state of contentment
> (causing restlessness, irritability and crying). The old wired ones and
> the older ´analogueˇ cordless ones do not seem to cause the same problems
> if kept at least one metre from the cot / bed.
>
> We have had a number of reports from parents that their babies did not
> sleep well and cried a lot when they used DECT monitors but were ok when
> no > baby monitor was used. When they then tried a cheaper analogue
> monitor, the infant then slept as well as they did with no monitor.


Yet more cr@p from Lenny.
Where is the correct scientific method to determine if there was any effect
at all?
You won't find it because there is none.

I could "prove" almost anything if I go along to a group of people and ask
them the right question which is what has been done here.


Even in the Panorama report where they tested an electro sensitive she only
got it correct 65% of the time which is not good proof that she is
sensitive.
If she was electrosensitive then it would be ~100%


 
Reply With Quote
 
NoNeedToKnow
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-22-2007, 08:54 AM
On 22 May 2007, Lenny <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

<< SNIP >>

Welcome to my killfile. I can see this being possibly of interest in
u.t.m but there are many people who use no wireless kit at home and I
for one consider these threads OT in u.t.broadband Bye forever.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Geoff Winkless
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-22-2007, 09:58 AM
NoNeedToKnow wrote:

> Welcome to my killfile. I can see this being possibly of interest in
> u.t.m but there are many people who use no wireless kit at home and I
> for one consider these threads OT in u.t.broadband Bye forever.


Thanks for letting us all know, though.

Geoff
 
Reply With Quote
 
Ivor Jones
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-22-2007, 11:19 PM
"Lenny" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:f2u7ln$qga$(E-Mail Removed)
> Quote:
> DECT Cordless Baby Monitors - Offical warning on DECT
> phones: Alarms 'pose danger'
> Sent by Sylvie:


Yawn......................................

Here we go again................


Ivor


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DHCP Warnings Event ID 1003 Mike Testovich Windows Networking 4 07-04-2007 05:54 AM
DHCP Warnings Event ID 1003 Mike Testovich Wireless Networks 3 07-04-2007 05:54 AM
NFS statd/lockd warnings Roger Leigh Linux Networking 2 12-22-2004 02:28 PM
netdiag (NetBT) - WARNINGS frier Windows Networking 0 12-13-2004 12:09 PM
NTDS Replication warnings Edward Ray \(502974\) Windows Networking 0 05-31-2004 09:04 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11