> Thanks for the response, Bob.
>
> The truth is that the computers belong to city employees who rarely if
> ever travel out of the city. However, there are a number of unsecured
> "hotspots" in the city and we would prefer that our employees not
> access them. All city access to the internet needs to be through our
> network, not someone else's. Why? Well, we had an officer sitting in
> his car downtown log onto an unfiltered network a few years ago and go
> to porn sites. A resident recorded it through the car window. There
> is a plan for a commercial mesh network to be installed and we want to
> keep our people off of it in most cases.
>
> Now, can anyone else help?
>
>
Others have suggested technical solutions. That's only part of the problem.
For what it's worth, there are obvious policy and leadership issues that
your management has apparently failed to anticipate, and they need
to start thinking about them before the problems escalate.
When you issue the taxpayer-provided equipment to the employees, issue
an unambiguous acceptable use policy too.
Audit the the machines regularly.
Discipline those who don't comply. And if the "officers" are of the
"police" variety, it's even more disturbing.
Surely a police officer who understands how to safely use a gun in
public with actual bullets can be trusted to use a laptop that includes
functional cd/floppy drives?? If not...you don't want 'em working for
you anyway.
Good luck with your vpn approach in the meantine:-)
|