comp.os.linux.advocacy added; followups set exclusively thereto.
In comp.os.linux.setup,
(E-Mail Removed)
<(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote
on Sun, 18 Jul 2004 20:25:05 -0700
<(E-Mail Removed)>:
> Originally posted on: 2002-08-21
Which makes it newer than some of the trolls' news items.
>
> I would like a distro of Linux that is easy to install (with Windows
> on the same computer). I don't want to learn the easy to
> understand concept of partitions, such as primary, extended
> and logical. If I can't see them, they ain't there!
One of the more interesting problems with any Linux distro is the
allocation of the proper amount of space on the disk for /,
/var, /usr, /home, etc. It's a bit tricky for a first-timer,
and I suspect most people simply say "oh, just put most of it
on /, with 2 * RAM for the swap partition". Certainly that's
simple enough.
>
> I want this Linux distro to look and feel like Windows exactly.
Warts and all, presumably. Or is it really hard for some
people to handle mouse buttons?
>
> I want this Linux distro to be easily configured and installed
> (no brainer) like Windows.
Including reboots?
>
> I want this Linux distro to be TOTALLY secure *cough like
> Windows. *wink *wink
Just open a port if you want to feel really (in)secure.
(Of course, if one really wants to get cute, one can set up
a "honeypot". That's a system which looks like a Windows
system but cannot be compromised; instead, it only looks
like it's compromised, while the hacker's access point
is logged for future action. I can't say much about such
tactics (I don't set up honeypots) but apparently there's
a few out there.)
>
> I want this Linux distro to be easily run with no documentation to
> read, since all those freakin' O'Reilly books are so God damn
> expensive, and the animals on the covers scare me.
Don't forget the 'man' command. That's just so ... difficult ...
to remember. Lessee, what was 'man' short for again?
Not automatic... :-)
>
> I want this Linux distro to recognize all my hardware, including
> my GeForce 4 video card. And if it doesn't I want someone to
> explain to me how to do this, since I don't want to go to the
> hardware homepage and actually do a search for the support
> page that tells me how to do this with Linux.
Not to mention sound cards, network cards, CD-ROMs, etc.
>
> I want this Linux distro to look all GUI for me, and I don't want
> to bother understanding the X Window System. Because that
> word, X Window System, makes me think of Windows and that
> gets me all excited and I get really confused.
Just remember, 'Ex-Windows System'.
>
> I want this Linux distro to come on one CD only, since Red Hat
> has like 5 ISO CDs and I'm too lazy to read the readme file to figure
> out which ones to download.
>
> I want this Linux distro to be easily run as a network but I don't
> want to know about any protocols, ip addressing, routers, switches,
> ipchains, iptables, or dns servers....But I consider myself an expert
> because I can telnet to a smtp server and send fake e-mail as
> (E-Mail Removed).
Woo.
>
> I want this Linux distro to have open source software on it only,
> since closed source is evil. And I want this software to be
> completely supported by the vendor/author so I can complain
> when their free software doesn't work for me.
>
> I want this Linux distro to be fully supported by rpms, since .tar
> and .gz for that matter are funny to me and complicated to work
> with...and a Linux distro that doesn't require i386 and i686 stuff
> since I have a Dell.
Dang. You won't like Slackware, Debian, or Gentoo then.
Slackware (last I looked) used very raw .tgz or .tbz;
Debian uses .deb; Gentoo uses .ebuild and compiles
everything on *your* computer. Oh, the horrors of choice!
Someone's probably even considering using .cab files for a
Linux distro, just to be perverse.
>
> I want this Linux distro to be command line free. I mean, come
> on, which is it -help or --help or -h?!
Or '-?'. '/' and '\' are *so* much simpler. Especially when
one tries to 'cd \\nodename\share' -- wait, does that work?
>
> I want this Linux distro to be able to play my Windows games and
> run my Windows programs on it, and if WINE doesn't support them,
> I want to know the "secret" that all you Linux hackers know in order
> to run them. Come on, you guys know how!
Heck yeah. Dual-boot. :-) Or use WinE, QEMU or VmWare.
>
> I want this Linux distro to be easily upgradeable to the newest and
> greatest kernel, even though I don't need it since I haven't installed
> any new hardware or software that isn't supported by the kernel I
> already use, and there are no known security issues with the
> current kernel I'm using...I still want to upgrade.
Yeah, one really misses those occasional random reboots
(either because of a BSOD or because of Yet Another
Security Update); this is the best Linux can do.
>
> I want this Linux distro to be the best distro out there, why? I don't
> know why or what I'm looking for exactly...I just want the best one
> out there....and I want it to look like Windows.
>
Well, the problem is that there are too many
editors for Linux for it to do that. Lessee...vi
(vile/vim/vi/elvis/nvi/???), emacs (emacs/xemacs/???),
jedit (an interesting Java variant), jed, joe, pico, nano,
kile, ted, gedit, kate, and yes, for those who absolutely can't
live without (a variant of) it -- gnotepad+.
The line blurs a bit when one includes word processors and
typesetters, but there's also abiword, Open Office, and koffice.
Lyx is an interesting TeX frontend; Amaya is still around as
an HTML editor. (Bluefish is a text editor with templates;
it's useful but somewhat limited.)
>
>
> Andrew
> www.wbglinks.net
>
> postscript: Yes, I'm bored and looking to waste time. And if you
> think I'm serious or this isn't funny, then go blow monkeys.
Somehow, I'm not sure inflatable simians is that much of a market. :-)
--
#191,
(E-Mail Removed) -- insert random monkey business here
It's still legal to go .sigless.