Thanks Jack,
The environment should be fine. I will be able to minimise the coax runs to
a few yards at most.
I went to your link below. Seems that a bridge uses 2 access points as
opposed to a single access point and a wireless NIC, is that correct?
Joel
"Jack" <www.ezlan.net> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi
> You are on the right track.
>
> The deciding factor would be the envioroment.
>
> If the two Antennae are facing one the other and there is No obstructions
it
> should work.
>
> Take into consideration that an extension Antennae with long Coax is not a
> good solution since 2.4 GHz rapidly lose gain with length.
>
> If the remote place having more then one computer or and long Antenna Coax
> is needed you should consider Bridging rather then simple AP to client
> connection. Wireless Bridging: http://www.ezlan.net/bridging.html
>
> Jack (MVP-Networking).
>
>
>
>
>
> "Joel Dorfan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:#(E-Mail Removed)...
> > We have a network running 2000 server and fixed IP adresses in the
> > 192.168... range.
> >
> > The router is a 24 port 3Com superstack.
> >
> > One of the workstations is connected by a very circuitous UTP cable
which
> > often gives us trouble. It is across a driveway in another building
about
> 50
> > yards away. I would like to replace this single connection with
wireless.
> > This remote PC is in a warehouse and its main function is the printing
of
> > picking slips sent to it from one other PC on the network.
> >
> > I dont know much about wirless networking but I envisage plugging an
> access
> > point into the above router in place of where the current UTP cable is
> > plugged and a wireless NIC in the remote PC. I would also use external
> > antennas both sides to improve throughput.
> >
> > Is my thinking correct? Are there any possible problems that I could
> > experience setting this up?
> >
> > Netgear WG602 access point and WAG311GE PCI adapter have been suggested
as
> a
> > possible solution. Does this make sense?
> >
> > What would you recommend?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Joel
> >
> >
>
>