Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > Remote access to files

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Remote access to files

 
 
Lourenço Teodoro
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-18-2004, 07:24 PM
I have two offices connected using VPN and T1 lines. I need to create a file
server that people in both offices can use. I tried using a normal sharing
in the Windows 2k Server, but it is extremely slow. Does anyone have any
suggestion about the best approach to have a reasonable performance? It
would be good if I could at least browse the files faster.

Lourenço.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Doug Sherman [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-18-2004, 07:52 PM
If you are using Windows RRAS for a VPN server, you may get better
performance by switching to a hardware solution. RRAS servers carry
significant overhead when providing VPN access and even T1 connections can
be sluggish. In my experience RRAS performs better with a persistent router
to router connection (ie. Win2k or 2003 servers at both ends) than with a
client/server configuration - not sure why.

There are many inexpensive VPN server devices available to suit your needs.
In general such devices give faster performance than a Windows software
solution. They are almost never called VPN servers - usually VPN end points
or something like that - beware of 'supports VPN connections' - you do not
want a VPN pass through device.

An alternative is Terminal Services/Remote Desktop. RDP performance is
almost always superior to VPN - and, yes - RDP connections are encrypted.

Doug Sherman
MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP


"Lourenço Teodoro" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:OGTe#(E-Mail Removed)...
> I have two offices connected using VPN and T1 lines. I need to create a

file
> server that people in both offices can use. I tried using a normal sharing
> in the Windows 2k Server, but it is extremely slow. Does anyone have any
> suggestion about the best approach to have a reasonable performance? It
> would be good if I could at least browse the files faster.
>
> Lourenço.
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Lourenço Teodoro
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-18-2004, 10:54 PM
Mr. Sherman,

I really do not think that my problem is hardware. I also believe that my
Windows 2k Servers as end points are not being the bottleneck. The reason
why I say this is because I have been using SourceOffSite to share source
code and it is 10 times faster than the Windows Network file transfer.

SourceOffSite should use compression or something similar to that. It also
keeps a local list of the directories, so it does not have to be downloaded
every time that the user selects a folder. Unfortunately this solution
applied for normal files would require that every user copies the file to
his local machine before using it.

I hope that I will be able to find a software package such as SourceOffSite
that speeds up file transfers and mainly file browser and allows me to work
with the files on the server.

Lourenço.

"Doug Sherman [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> If you are using Windows RRAS for a VPN server, you may get better
> performance by switching to a hardware solution. RRAS servers carry
> significant overhead when providing VPN access and even T1 connections can
> be sluggish. In my experience RRAS performs better with a persistent

router
> to router connection (ie. Win2k or 2003 servers at both ends) than with a
> client/server configuration - not sure why.
>
> There are many inexpensive VPN server devices available to suit your

needs.
> In general such devices give faster performance than a Windows software
> solution. They are almost never called VPN servers - usually VPN end

points
> or something like that - beware of 'supports VPN connections' - you do

not
> want a VPN pass through device.
>
> An alternative is Terminal Services/Remote Desktop. RDP performance is
> almost always superior to VPN - and, yes - RDP connections are encrypted.
>
> Doug Sherman
> MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
>
>
> "Lourenço Teodoro" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:OGTe#(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I have two offices connected using VPN and T1 lines. I need to create a

> file
> > server that people in both offices can use. I tried using a normal

sharing
> > in the Windows 2k Server, but it is extremely slow. Does anyone have any
> > suggestion about the best approach to have a reasonable performance? It
> > would be good if I could at least browse the files faster.
> >
> > Lourenço.
> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Bill Grant
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-18-2004, 11:31 PM
Have you considered using NFS, so that both sites have a local copy of the
files?

"Lourenço Teodoro" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:OGTe#(E-Mail Removed)...
> I have two offices connected using VPN and T1 lines. I need to create a

file
> server that people in both offices can use. I tried using a normal sharing
> in the Windows 2k Server, but it is extremely slow. Does anyone have any
> suggestion about the best approach to have a reasonable performance? It
> would be good if I could at least browse the files faster.
>
> Lourenço.
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Doug Sherman [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-19-2004, 12:33 AM
maybe DFS?

"Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Have you considered using NFS, so that both sites have a local copy of

the
> files?
>
> "Lourenço Teodoro" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:OGTe#(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I have two offices connected using VPN and T1 lines. I need to create a

> file
> > server that people in both offices can use. I tried using a normal

sharing
> > in the Windows 2k Server, but it is extremely slow. Does anyone have any
> > suggestion about the best approach to have a reasonable performance? It
> > would be good if I could at least browse the files faster.
> >
> > Lourenço.
> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Bill Grant
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-19-2004, 01:46 AM
Yes Doug, that looks better!

"Doug Sherman [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> maybe DFS?
>
> "Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Have you considered using NFS, so that both sites have a local copy of

> the
> > files?
> >
> > "Lourenço Teodoro" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:OGTe#(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I have two offices connected using VPN and T1 lines. I need to create

a
> > file
> > > server that people in both offices can use. I tried using a normal

> sharing
> > > in the Windows 2k Server, but it is extremely slow. Does anyone have

any
> > > suggestion about the best approach to have a reasonable performance?

It
> > > would be good if I could at least browse the files faster.
> > >
> > > Lourenço.
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Taking ownership of files on remote computer Matthias Hofmann Windows Networking 6 06-09-2009 03:13 PM
routing and remote access & remote desktop connection SJMP Windows Networking 1 10-22-2008 01:55 PM
Enable Remote Laptops to run GPO's, and access files Justin Windows Networking 4 11-17-2007 08:57 AM
Remote Access Policies error in Routing & Remote Access Mark Windows Networking 1 06-28-2004 03:57 AM
remote desktop with routing and remote access Marcus \(Cascom\) Windows Networking 3 01-17-2004 05:15 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11