Redirecting traffic from AP

Hi Chicks!

I need suggestions/howtos do do the following:


PC1---------AP-----------PC2
|
|
|
SERVER


When PC1 accesses PC2, it needs to go through the server,
so that I can filter, log and shape the traffic.

The AP is a wireless AP and PC1 and PC2 are wireless clients.

The AP has a "client isolation" setting, that stops is acting
as a bridge between clients. It is wired to the server, and
sends all traffic that way.

Whats the simplest way I can set this up so PC1 and PC2 can
still communicate, with isolation enabled on the AP?

Thanks

Guys

(I do want a reply!)

Coenraad Loubser wrote:
> Hi Chicks!
>
> I need suggestions/howtos do do the following:
>
>
> PC1---------AP-----------PC2
> |
> |
> |
> SERVER
>
>
> When PC1 accesses PC2, it needs to go through the server,
> so that I can filter, log and shape the traffic.
>
> The AP is a wireless AP and PC1 and PC2 are wireless clients.
>
> The AP has a "client isolation" setting, that stops is acting
> as a bridge between clients. It is wired to the server, and
> sends all traffic that way.
>
> Whats the simplest way I can set this up so PC1 and PC2 can
> still communicate, with isolation enabled on the AP?
>
> Thanks
>
> Guys
>
> (I do want a reply!)
>

That depends on the make of the AP. You've got your reply :-)

Trygve Selmer wrote:
> Coenraad Loubser wrote:
>
>> Hi Chicks!
>>
>> I need suggestions/howtos do do the following:
>>
>>
>> PC1---------AP-----------PC2
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> SERVER
>>
>>
>> When PC1 accesses PC2, it needs to go through the server,
>> so that I can filter, log and shape the traffic.
>>
>> The AP is a wireless AP and PC1 and PC2 are wireless clients.
>>
>> The AP has a "client isolation" setting, that stops is acting
>> as a bridge between clients. It is wired to the server, and
>> sends all traffic that way.
>>
>> Whats the simplest way I can set this up so PC1 and PC2 can
>> still communicate, with isolation enabled on the AP?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Guys
>>
>> (I do want a reply!)
>>
>
> That depends on the make of the AP. You've got your reply :-)
>
No it doesnt you stupid gay prick!

Should I put PC1 and PC2 on different subnets, and route the
intra-subnet traffic on the linux box?

I don't really want this, I want PC1 and PC2 on the same subnet,
but I'm not sure how to configure the linux box to do this.

The AP is a simple bridge, that just forwards all packets to the server.
It doesnt matter that it's wireless or not.

Any ideas?

Thanks

Coenraad Loubser wrote:
> Trygve Selmer wrote:
>
>> Coenraad Loubser wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chicks!
>>>
>>> I need suggestions/howtos do do the following:
>>>
>>>
>>> PC1---------AP-----------PC2
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |
>>> SERVER
>>>
>>>
>>> When PC1 accesses PC2, it needs to go through the server,
>>> so that I can filter, log and shape the traffic.
>>>
>>> The AP is a wireless AP and PC1 and PC2 are wireless clients.
>>>
>>> The AP has a "client isolation" setting, that stops is acting
>>> as a bridge between clients. It is wired to the server, and
>>> sends all traffic that way.
>>>
>>> Whats the simplest way I can set this up so PC1 and PC2 can
>>> still communicate, with isolation enabled on the AP?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Guys
>>>
>>> (I do want a reply!)
>>>
>>
>> That depends on the make of the AP. You've got your reply :-)
>>
> No it doesnt you stupid gay prick!

Sorry, but with that attitude I will not give you any help.

Trygve Selmer wrote:
> Coenraad Loubser wrote:
>
>> Trygve Selmer wrote:
>>
>>> Coenraad Loubser wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chicks!
>>>>
>>>> I need suggestions/howtos do do the following:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PC1---------AP-----------PC2
>>>> |
>>>> |
>>>> |
>>>> SERVER
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When PC1 accesses PC2, it needs to go through the server,
>>>> so that I can filter, log and shape the traffic.
>>>>
>>>> The AP is a wireless AP and PC1 and PC2 are wireless clients.
>>>>
>>>> The AP has a "client isolation" setting, that stops is acting
>>>> as a bridge between clients. It is wired to the server, and
>>>> sends all traffic that way.
>>>>
>>>> Whats the simplest way I can set this up so PC1 and PC2 can
>>>> still communicate, with isolation enabled on the AP?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Guys
>>>>
>>>> (I do want a reply!)
>>>>
>>>
>>> That depends on the make of the AP. You've got your reply :-)
>>>
>> No it doesnt you stupid gay prick!
>
>
> Sorry, but with that attitude I will not give you any help.
>
Awww, what, no sense of humour?

Do unto others?

You wouldnt be able to help even if you tried.

I dont care, I dont even look at the names of posters. When I can help I
do, so whatever, blah

Trygve Selmer wrote:
> Coenraad Loubser wrote:
>
>> Trygve Selmer wrote:
>>
>>> Coenraad Loubser wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chicks!
>>>>
>>>> I need suggestions/howtos do do the following:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PC1---------AP-----------PC2
>>>> |
>>>> |
>>>> |
>>>> SERVER
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When PC1 accesses PC2, it needs to go through the server,
>>>> so that I can filter, log and shape the traffic.
>>>>
>>>> The AP is a wireless AP and PC1 and PC2 are wireless clients.
>>>>
>>>> The AP has a "client isolation" setting, that stops is acting
>>>> as a bridge between clients. It is wired to the server, and
>>>> sends all traffic that way.
>>>>
>>>> Whats the simplest way I can set this up so PC1 and PC2 can
>>>> still communicate, with isolation enabled on the AP?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Guys
>>>>
>>>> (I do want a reply!)
>>>>
>>>
>>> That depends on the make of the AP. You've got your reply :-)
>>>
>> No it doesnt you stupid gay prick!
>
>
> Sorry, but with that attitude I will not give you any help.
>
Oh please great master, tell me the answer, I will do ANYTHING!