In article <bidq8r$85m$1@news>, PapaBear wrote:
> Please help.
I've never installed and do not use Red Hat, so I know little of how its
installer works. For the RH-specific part of this you would do better in
a RH newsgroup or forum.
> I run a few computers in a network, among others a small one, an old 80486,
> with only a diskette and a hard-disk.
> It ran Slackware 2.0.34, but that's rather old. I'd like to install RedHat
> 7.0 and I'm trying to do so by performing a
1. Red Hat 7.0 is old as well, and was generally considered buggy.
2. Why the distro change? Slackware is probably better on a 486. If you
have the room any recent version would be fine. I can't say this
definitively, but I strongly suspect you'd have a harder time
trimming Red Hat 7.0 to fit on a small disk than you would Slackware
9.0 or -current. It's no great feat to get a functional Slackware in
under 100MB; see ZipSlack for proof.
> On jacob, I made a directory /RH7/RedHat and copied all the stuff from the
> two binary CD's /RedHat directories there.
I'll bet this is the problem. You need to find out what directories the
installer expects to find, and where they should be in relation to the
NFS mount point. A Red Hat issue, sorry, no help from me.
> Next, I created an entry in the /etc/exports file, as follows:
> /RH7/RedHat/ *.prodeo(rw)
Why rw? Does the installer need write access? If so what does it do if
installing from CD?
> The systems do recognize this action, jacob gives me a console message:
> Aug 25 21:15:23 jacob rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from
> benjamin.prodeo:611 for /RH7/RedHat (/RH7/RedHat)
Yes, this indicates that NFS is working on both the client and the
server.
> Does anyone know what to do next? I'm out of options...
Stay with Slackware.

--
/dev/rob0 - preferred_email=i$((28*28+28))@softhome.net
or put "not-spam" or "/dev/rob0" in Subject header to reply