Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > Reasons to buy 802.11g?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Reasons to buy 802.11g?

 
 
Steve
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-10-2003, 07:54 PM
Other than huge file transfers, is there any reason to purchase
802.11g? The 802.11b is already 10x the speed of DSL, not sure what
the advantage would be in going with g...

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Keith Roberts
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-10-2003, 08:49 PM
Because it is faster - LOL

Steve wrote:
> Other than huge file transfers, is there any reason to purchase
> 802.11g? The 802.11b is already 10x the speed of DSL, not sure what
> the advantage would be in going with g...



 
Reply With Quote
 
John T
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-10-2003, 08:58 PM
LAN speed, not 'Net speed. If you need local performance (like moving large
files regularly), then WirelessG is what you want. Most home nets will be
more than satisfied with B, though.

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/tknoFlyer
__________


"Steve" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
Other than huge file transfers, is there any reason to purchase
802.11g? The 802.11b is already 10x the speed of DSL, not sure what
the advantage would be in going with g...


 
Reply With Quote
 
danco@ns2.pebble.org
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-10-2003, 10:09 PM
In article <(E-Mail Removed) om>, John T wrote:

> Most home nets will be more than satisfied with B, though.


As a home LAN, B is frustratingly SLOW. It takes a few minutes to copy
files with B that a cheap 100MB LAN copies in 20 seconds or less. So far
as I'm concerned, both B (and even G) are only good for light use, such
as browsing the Web and watching a streaming video. It would be good if
some enterprising manufacturer would come along and create cards that
utilize channels 1, 6, and 11 in parallel for tripple G throughput. :-)

- Dan
 
Reply With Quote
 
Steve
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-11-2003, 12:12 AM
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>As a home LAN, B is frustratingly SLOW. It takes a few minutes to copy
>files with B that a cheap 100MB LAN copies in 20 seconds or less.


What size files are we talking about?

 
Reply With Quote
 
danco@ns2.pebble.org
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-11-2003, 12:32 AM
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Steve wrote:
> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>>As a home LAN, B is frustratingly SLOW. It takes a few minutes to copy
>>files with B that a cheap 100MB LAN copies in 20 seconds or less.

>
> What size files are we talking about?
>


A few hundred megs at most of Visual C projects, installation kits,
misc, executables, sources (million+ lines of code), etc. Small
potatoes really and at 100MB they move quickly. At 802.11b speeds,
"considerable patience" is required.

- Dan
 
Reply With Quote
 
John T
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-11-2003, 03:11 AM
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)
>
> A few hundred megs at most of Visual C projects, installation kits,
> misc, executables, sources (million+ lines of code), etc. Small
> potatoes really and at 100MB they move quickly. At 802.11b speeds,
> "considerable patience" is required.


That's what makes you the "atypical" home net user, I think. *Most* home
networks have far simpler requirements (sharing resources like a single 'Net
conn, printer/file sharing, and maybe gaming).

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/tknoFlyer
_______________



 
Reply With Quote
 
Terminal
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-11-2003, 03:33 AM
I have a Video system for recording MPEGs then sending them to my system
with a DVD burner. Talk about slow, move a 4 Gig file across 802.11b. I
have a batch file set up to move the files at night. It takes about 2 1/2
hours.

"John T" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) s.com...
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)
> >
> > A few hundred megs at most of Visual C projects, installation kits,
> > misc, executables, sources (million+ lines of code), etc. Small
> > potatoes really and at 100MB they move quickly. At 802.11b speeds,
> > "considerable patience" is required.

>
> That's what makes you the "atypical" home net user, I think. *Most* home
> networks have far simpler requirements (sharing resources like a single

'Net
> conn, printer/file sharing, and maybe gaming).
>
> --
> John T
> http://tknowlogy.com/tknoFlyer
> _______________
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=F4g=EAr?=
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-11-2003, 04:04 AM
Terminal wrote:

> I have a Video system for recording MPEGs then sending them to my system
> with a DVD burner. Talk about slow, move a 4 Gig file across 802.11b. I
> have a batch file set up to move the files at night. It takes about 2 1/2
> hours.


4 gig files? Jesus f**king christ.

--
Hey doc, I have a Boing 747. When I load it down with bricks it won't fly!

 
Reply With Quote
 
John T
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-11-2003, 05:05 AM
"Rôgêr" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:3f0e3753$(E-Mail Removed)
>
> 4 gig files? Jesus f**king christ.


Tell me about it. Buy a DVD burner!

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/tknoFlyer
_______________



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More reasons to use a router... NoNeedToKnow Broadband 10 03-02-2007 08:29 PM
Virgin Net - Any reasons against? Brian Broadband 5 04-02-2005 12:44 AM
500 Reasons not to buy Tiscali$ 7 Broadband 4 02-09-2005 11:42 PM
Migrating AWAY from BT (for obvious reasons) Linker3000 Broadband 2 10-17-2004 07:53 PM
Reasons for intermittent ICS Coyoteboy Windows Networking 3 09-30-2003 03:04 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11