Re: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument when adding route... help!

Pascal Hambourg

Guest

Posts: n/a

11-17-2009, 09:36 AM

David Schwartz a écrit :
>
> Is 68.164.***.238 a *local* address?

Rowan a écrit :
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:C6:0C:98
> inet addr:68.164.***.238 Bcast:68.164.192.239 Mask:
> 255.255.255.248

Looks like it is.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Re: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument when adding route... help!	Pascal Hambourg	Linux Networking	0	11-17-2009 09:20 AM
RTNETLINK answers: Network isn't reachable	ic3princess@arcor.de	Linux Networking	0	06-11-2007 10:12 AM
stty: standard input: Invalid argument	Christian Christmann	Linux Networking	2	10-10-2006 10:30 PM
rtnetlink: network unreachable for Routing for multiple uplinks using ip route add	joerg sauer	Linux Networking	6	04-19-2005 11:13 AM
IPv6-over-IPv4: "RTNETLINK answers: No route to host"-Error	Thorsten Becker	Linux Networking	0	08-22-2004 03:33 PM