Re: PlusNet just wants to be loved - again Oh dear shame it didntlast long enough for the ink to dry and keep us out of unfair contracts.

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:36:20 +0100, Bassplus wrote:

> Chop chop Plusnet, get me my MAC in the required time or I may need to
> expend more effort in this.

Have you followed the instructions and called them or sent them the
required written notice?

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:47:59 +0100, Bassplus wrote:

> On 20 Jul 2009 10:42:59 GMT, R Johnson <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:36:20 +0100, Bassplus wrote:
>>
>>> Chop chop Plusnet, get me my MAC in the required time or I may need to
>>> expend more effort in this.
>>
>>Have you followed the instructions and called them or sent them the
>>required written notice?
>
> Of course I have. I'm no wibblywobbly fool.
>
> What's it to you?
When was this?

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:57:42 +0100, Bassplus wrote:

> On 20 Jul 2009 10:49:18 GMT, R Johnson <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:47:59 +0100, Bassplus wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 Jul 2009 10:42:59 GMT, R Johnson <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:36:20 +0100, Bassplus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Chop chop Plusnet, get me my MAC in the required time or I may need
>>>>> to expend more effort in this.
>>>>
>>>>Have you followed the instructions and called them or sent them the
>>>>required written notice?
>>>
>>> Of course I have. I'm no wibblywobbly fool.
>>>
>>> What's it to you?
>>When was this?
>
> Why you going to sniff around the local letterboxes with a piece of gum
> and bit of string! The mind boggles.
That would indicate that it is still in a letterbox. Is this correct?
>
> Thanks and all that but I don't need any help with MACs either,
> certainly not if it's anything like your current incompetent
> performance. I'd end up coughing up a 10 year contract rather than a 30
> day one!
>
> You're a bit too slippery for your own good. Glad I don't have to smell
> it too!
>
> If you spent 1% of your effort trolling, in to trying to be helpful you
> might be surprised to find out you're not such a ding dong after all?
>
> Somehow I fear I am completely wrong, but being Christian I have to give
> it a shot.
This is all opinion and ranting so no response is required.

To clarify, you don't appear to have an issue with obtaining a MAC.
You have an issue with your voice provider (BT) awaiting a visit
You are leaving Plusnet.

So the issue is resolved and any tickets can be closed?

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:22:26 +0100, Bassplus wrote:
>>To clarify, you don't appear to have an issue with obtaining a MAC.
>
> I envisage great issue with obtaining my MAC from Plusnet. I'll be happy
> to be proved wrong.
So at this time you do not have any reasonable grounds for complaining
that you not received a MAC, correct?
>
>
>>You are leaving Plusnet.
>
> You bet.
>
In summary;
You had an issue with your voice line and have now called the right
people.

You are unhappy with Plusnet because of this, so you are leaving.
That looks like it is resolved. Glad we were able to help you here at UTB.

> Be interesting to see if all this blows up what a Plusnet employee was
> doing attacking, and disrupting legitimate complaint against a Plusnet
> customer on usenet?
This very statement highlights the main area giving you issues Sam.
You've made an assumption and it is incorrect. I do not work for or have
any connection with Plusnet at all. I don't host with them, I don't have
service from them and I don't represent them. Making assumptions leads to
mistakes. For example, assuming your ISP is responsible for your
telephone line - they are not.

> For example do you have official sanction to conduct
> a dirty tricks campaign?
If you wish to make slanderous, libellous or offensive statements in
USENET you may find people pay interest in who you are.

>I think regardless it wont bode well for Plusnet.
This has no basis in fact and is just your opinion.

> I am quite distraught and upset at this intimidation and bullying from
> Plusnet.
And I'm very offended by your language. So much so I have taken it up
with, Alexander Bartolich (who provides the free USENET posting you have
abused). Subject to his decision I will either publish your full details
so people who make use of the USENET archives can make an informed
decision about your posts and your mental capability.

You are aware that you may have commited a number of offences under the
Malicious Communications Act of 1988 and Telecommunications Act of 1997?
This will probably only result in a warning or fixed penalty but it will
be recorded. This may be interesting if you are in need of security
clearance or an CRB check at any point.

{snipped the rest as it has no useful basis in fact}

On 20 Jul 2009 11:52:24 GMT, R Johnson <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>And I'm very offended by your language. So much so I have taken it up
>with, Alexander Bartolich

FUCK

CUNT

FUCK

CUNT

WANK

SHIT

Are you offended by my language too, cunty?

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:21:01 +0100, Bassplus wrote:
>>So at this time you do not have any reasonable grounds for complaining
>>that you not received a MAC, correct?
>
> Incorrect.
Please explain.
>
>
>>>>You are leaving Plusnet.
>>>
>>> You bet.
>>>
>>In summary;
>
>>You had an issue with your voice line and have now called the right
>>people.
>
> Incorrect.
Please explain.
>
>>You are unhappy with Plusnet because of this, so you are leaving. That
>>looks like it is resolved. Glad we were able to help you here at UTB.
>
> Incorrect.
Please explain
>
>
>>If you wish to make slanderous, libellous or offensive statements in
>>USENET you may find people pay interest in who you are.
>
> I'm happy to take on all comers.
On balance you are simply to insignificant to deal with. Your finest hour
a few anonymous swear words in USENET. It's not really big time
>

> Not very clever of a Plusnet employee to continue his harassment
> especially once ousted.
I've corrected you once on this, however you are entirely free to believe
what you want.

>
>>You are aware that you may have commited a number of offences under the
>>Malicious Communications Act of 1988 and Telecommunications Act of 1997?
>>This will probably only result in a warning or fixed penalty but it will
>>be recorded. This may be interesting if you are in need of security
>>clearance or an CRB check at any point.
>
> I'm well aware what I can and cannot do creepy crawly. You obviously
> don't know your limitations. That being a loud mouthed impotent little
> wanker who cant back up his threats. Unless of course you care to prove
> me wrong, in which case we will all be highly amused. Any time span for
> when you start providing this entertainment?

Sure, let me give you a ticket number. It's RJUN-UTB200709-01, please
quote it in all correspondence.

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:21:41 +0100, Pissflaps wrote:

> On 20 Jul 2009 11:52:24 GMT, R Johnson <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>And I'm very offended by your language. So much so I have taken it up
>>with, Alexander Bartolich
>
> FUCK
>
> CUNT
>
> FUCK
>
> CUNT
>
> WANK
>
> SHIT
>
> Are you offended by my language too, cunty?

Grossly offended. I'll take it up with news.alt.net.

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988..._19880027_en_1

On 20 Jul 2009 12:34:35 GMT, R Johnson <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:21:41 +0100, Pissflaps wrote:
>
>> On 20 Jul 2009 11:52:24 GMT, R Johnson <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>>And I'm very offended by your language. So much so I have taken it up
>>>with, Alexander Bartolich
>>
>> FUCK
>>
>> CUNT
>>
>> FUCK
>>
>> CUNT
>>
>> WANK
>>
>> SHIT
>>
>> Are you offended by my language too, cunty?
>
>Grossly offended. I'll take it up with news.alt.net.
>
>http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988..._19880027_en_1

Fucking PMSL!

Nice one. Tell 'em I said festering cunstain too.

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:42:05 +0100, Bassplus wrote:
{snip}
Please see the previous response to your ticket;
RJUN-UTB200709-01

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:57:09 +0100, Bassplus wrote:
{snip}
Please see the previous response to your ticket;
RJUN-UTB200709-01