In article <EDFhn.32959$e%(E-Mail Removed)>, Todd Allcock
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> If I want to
> >> watch, say, the last episode of "Lost" on Hulu, I need flash, at least
> >> until Hulu decides to roll out an App For That(tm).
> >
> > and they're reportedly doing just that
>
> IIRC, they've been "reportedly doing just that" for well over a year.
good apps take time. or maybe they're just slow.

i think the real
question is how they want to market it.
> >> I'm not a fan of
> >> flash- I just want content. If that content is wrapped in flash, I need
> >> flash, at least until that content is offered in an alternative form.
> >
> > transitions sometimes are tough.
>
> Only if you make them tough. There's no good reason not to support both
> flash and HTML5 now, then wean yourself off of one in favor of the other
> later.
if you support both, there's very little reason for providers to bother
having two formats. it only prolongs (or avoids) the transition.
the real push for html5 is the fact that the iphone doesn't support
flash.
> All the "buggy" and "battery eating" problems can and should be
> end-user decisions.
those same end users will then bitch that they get crappy battery life
or it keeps crashing.
> Someday,
> decades from now, when we control our PCs by sheer power of thought alone,
> we won't need keyboards or mice, either. Are you ready to ditch yours today
> in anticipation?
the ipad is halfway there - no mouse or keyboard. as for thought
control, perhaps someone will make a dock accessory for that.