Re: Complex subnet masks

Program ended abnormally on 2003-08-04 17:35, Due to a catastrophic
Peter Mairhofer error:
> Hello,
>
> I my new configuration, the net 192.168.0.0 should have the subnets
> 192.168.0.1(-192.168.0.255) up to 192.168.99.1(-192.168.99.255)
>
> My other network should just have the network 192.168.200.0/255.255.255.0.
>
> Everything bigger than xxx.xxx.99.xxx which is not xxx.xxx.200.xxx should
> be reserved, so the former network 192.168.0.0/16 should only be able to
> address 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.99.255 any more.
>
> What are the correct subnet masks?
>

You can't with just one subnet mask. The closest you could have is:

192.168.0.0 / 255.255.128.0 (192.168.0.1 - 192.168.127.255)
or
192.168.0.0 / 255.255.192.0 (192.168.0.1 - 192.168.63.255)

--
Francois Labreque | The surest sign of the existence of extra-
flabreque | terrestrial intelligence is that they never
@ | bothered to come down here and visit us!
videotron.ca | - Calvin