On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:21:16 +0000 (UTC), Judy Zappacosta
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:08:39 -0700 (PDT), bod43 wrote:
>
>> The top two determine which interfaces are used for
>> traffic sent to your router,
>
>I first ran an "ipconfig /all" which defined the LAN at 192.168.1.101 and
>the WAN at 192.168.1.102.
The ipconfig command doesn't tell you that. It tells you the IP
address assigned to each network interface, their respective subnet
masks, gateways, and DNS servers.
What you found is that one of your network interfaces is assigned the
IP address 192.168.1.101 and the other network interface is assigned
the IP address 192.168.1.102.
LAN = local area network, the network on your side of the router.
WAN = wide area network, everything on the other side of the router.
>Then I ran a "route /print" which reported the 192.168.1.101 metric cost
>was 20 and the 192.168.1.102 metric cost was 25.
The command is simply "route print", not "route /print", but you got
it right since you saw the metrics.
>So, given your information, I can conclude the WinXP PC is using the LAN
>which has a lower metric cost than the WAN.
LAN and WAN are again misused here, but you're correct that one
interface (with the lower metric) is given priority over the other
interface (with the higher metric).
>Is a "20" a "decent" metric cost?
The actual metric values are unimportant. The important thing is their
values relative to each other.
|