Thanks, Bill. I will set this up over the weekend and let you know the
results.
Dan Moseley
"Bill Grant" wrote:
> Yes. You need to configure the RRAS server at the home office to accept a
> router to router connection (sometimes called LAN to LAN or site to site).
> This involves configuring a demand-dial interface to act as the endpoint of
> the VPN and setting up a static route for the remote office subnet linked to
> this demand-dial interface.
>
> The calling router then uses the name of the demand-dial interface (on
> the answering router) as its username when it connects. The connection is
> made to the dd interface and the static route is added to the routing table.
> The "answering" router now has a subnet route for the remote office through
> the VPN connection. (If you do not use the name of a demand-dial interface
> as the username, you connect to the default interface and the static route
> is not activated. You only get a host route back to the calling machine
> itself. This how RRAS is able to handle multiple remote sites as well as
> normal client-server VPN connections).
>
> If the router at the remote site is also RRAS you can configure it the
> same way to give more flexibility. (You then have the standard RRAS router
> to router config which can be initiated from either end).
>
> "Daniel Moseley" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:31E26673-C75C-4632-8100-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >A remote office uses its vpn router to open a PPTP session with a Windows
> > 2003 RAS host in the home office. The vpn router has a static route table
> > pointing the remote office LAN (192.168.10.0) to the home office LAN
> > (192.168.100.0) The RAS host is configured as a remote access server only.
> > Users on the remote office LAN have access to network resources in the
> > home
> > office. Is it possible to configure the RAS host so that users on the
> > home
> > office LAN may access resources on the remote office LAN over this same
> > PPTP
> > connection?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Dan Moseley
>
>
>
|