(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> I guess the question is: What should my route look like? I have 1
> NIC, and my own route/gateway.........
>
> [root@nitelife mail]# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> 169.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
> lo
> default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
>
>
> Is that standard???
>
I have something very similar on my servers.
I assume 192.168.1.1 is your gateway. In which case - your routing table
looks fine. What it's saying is..
IP addresses in the networks 192.168.1.X and 169.254.X.X can be reached
directly via the "eth0" interface, and without going through a router
(Other posters have commented on the 169.254.X.X question).
IP addresses 127.X.X.X can be reached directly via the "lo" interface -
in other words: they are "local" to the machine.
To reach any other address, go via "eth0" and use 192.168.1.1 as the
gateway.
If you dont want/need the 169.254.X.X route, then add the line
"NOZEROCONF=yes" to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
(if the file exists, that is).
Chris
--
http://www.lowth.com/rope - iptables match-module scripting language.
Control Bittorrent, Gnutella and other high-level protocols.