"George Valkov" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Miha,
> In general I can assign any free TCP port number for the SSL and It will
> work fine. I don't want to provide You with the exact port number for
> security reasons.
I'm not sure about the original problem, but using SSL on non-standard ports
is in itself a security risk and most proxy servers are hardcoded to only
allow SSL on the standard 443 port. The security of SSL is based on the
abilities of SSL itself and not by being used on a "secret" port. Here's is
a quote from one article on that subject. It originated from Netscape
Communications Corporation. The first of the three links below is the link
to the full article.
"CONNECT is really a lower-level function than the rest of the HTTP methods,
kind of an escape mechanism for saying that the proxy should not interfere
with the transaction, but merely forward the data. This is because the proxy
should not need to know the entire URI that is being accessed (privacy,
security), only the information that it explicitly needs (hostname and port
number). Due to this fact, the proxy cannot verify that the protocol being
spoken is really SSL, and so the proxy configuration should explicitly limit
allowed connections to well-known SSL ports (such as 443 for HTTPS, 563 for
SNEWS, as assigned by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority). "
Tunneling SSL Through a WWW Proxy
http://muffin.doit.org/docs/rfc/tunneling_ssl.html
(For Proxy2)
184028 - Error Message: 12204 SSL Port Specified Is Not Allowed
http://support.microsoft.com/default...en-us%3b184028
(For ISA)
283284 - Blank Page or Page Cannot Be Displayed When You View SSL Sites
Through ISA Server
http://support.microsoft.com/default...4&Product=ISAS
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com