"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
: "Oli Restorick [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
: news:(E-Mail Removed)...
: > 2) The member server has no default gateway on the LAN interface (not
: > necessarily a problem, e.g. if you're on a single subnet)
:
: I saw that too, but is has to be that way. It has two NICs and is acting
as
: the "NAT firewall" between the private system and the Internet. Only one
: Default Gateway is allowed and it must be on the NIC facing the ISP (no
: choice about that). If there are multiple private subnets then it has to
be
: handled by static Routes.
:
: It is required for Routing to be enabled for NAT to function. Reasonable
: security can be had with this machine providing the Internet Connection if
: the machine is configured properly and has only what is required running
on
: it, various LAN service unbound from the external NIC, etc.
:
: > 5) IP Routing is enabled on the DC. Are you sure you want to do that?
:
: Good eye! I didn't see that one. I'd say it should be disabled. It's kinda
: useless with only one NIC anyway and multi-homed DC's are "frowned upon".
: That probably isn't the cause, but I think it should be disabled to make
: sure.
:
: We may have to wait and see what it does after the mask is straightened
out.
: Also, I have heard of cases where those gigabit Nics get kinda "stupid".
You both are extremely helpful however informing Faisal to not piggy-back a
thread and then proceeding to ignore your own suggestion sends a mixed
message. Jes' sayin'...
--
Roland Hall
/* This information is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
without any warranty; without even the implied warranty of merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose. */
Online Support for IT Professionals -
http://support.microsoft.com/service...p?fr=0&sd=tech
How-to: Windows 2000 DNS:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;308201
FAQ W2K/2K3 DNS:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;291382