Presistant Port Forwarding Not Working On MN-700

I have setup my New MN-700 router from WorstBuy and I
cannot forward any activity to any pc in my network, I try
to forward port 80 to my local pc ending in .11 and ftp to
one ending in .5, neither work, I have tried a DMZ to .11,
no luck!

As for my network and settings here they are, I have a MS
Win 2k Server with DHCP and I am set to use the mask
192.168.175.xxx and sub is 255.255.255.0, my router is
replaceing a dlink 802.11b that works fine, it's ip was
192.168.175.100 and the new MN-700 is replaceing that with
the same ip.

Help!!!!

Are You trying to connect to the WAN IP address from behind the MN-700?
If that is the case it will not work. The MN-700 doesn't have
loopback support at this point.

Jt wrote:
> I have setup my New MN-700 router from WorstBuy and I
> cannot forward any activity to any pc in my network, I try
> to forward port 80 to my local pc ending in .11 and ftp to
> one ending in .5, neither work, I have tried a DMZ to .11,
> no luck!
>
> As for my network and settings here they are, I have a MS
> Win 2k Server with DHCP and I am set to use the mask
> 192.168.175.xxx and sub is 255.255.255.0, my router is
> replaceing a dlink 802.11b that works fine, it's ip was
> 192.168.175.100 and the new MN-700 is replaceing that with
> the same ip.
>
> Help!!!!

So what you are trying to say is that If I use another
connection (ex: dial up connection) it will work but from
within the lan it wont? That is so cheap!

I presume you are talking about loopback support? Apparently this will be
addresses in the next firmware upgrade which is rumoured to be around the
same time as XP SP2 (since there are some changes required to the firmware
as a result of SP2). This is all speculation since there seldom is any
contribution to this ng by any MS staffer (most are MVPs - volunteer users
who give a lot of their time to helping others in the ng).



<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:26f4f01c46396$dd2f8620$(E-Mail Removed)...
> So what you are trying to say is that If I use another
> connection (ex: dial up connection) it will work but from
> within the lan it wont? That is so cheap!