Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > PPPoA or PPPoE on Voyager 2100

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

PPPoA or PPPoE on Voyager 2100

 
 
Ian
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-06-2004, 11:30 AM

Hi,

I've just bought a Voyager 2100 wireless modem and it is working fine
on pppoa setting. Should I change this to pppoe for better connection
? I'm using BTyahoo broadband 1Mb service

thanks
Ian

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Peter M
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-06-2004, 11:44 AM
On 6 Nov 2004 in uk.telecom.broadband, Ian wrote:

> it is working fine on pppoa setting. Should I change this


What change were you hoping for ? extra 2% performance ?

>to pppoe for better connection


Although BT has indicated that it will/does support PPPoE, I don't know
if this is currently the case. Certainly all that I've read since 2000
has used PPPoA and I'd stick with what works if I were you :-) Peter

PS Using a mail address <(E-Mail Removed)> that increases junk mail might
be a bad idea... myhome.com is registered to Unilever plc, in the UK.

--
PlusNet <http://tinyurl.com/24ymz> - I recommend them and save some cash.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Ivor Jones
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-06-2004, 11:59 AM

"Peter M" <us-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On 6 Nov 2004 in uk.telecom.broadband, Ian wrote:
>
>> it is working fine on pppoa setting. Should I change this

>
> What change were you hoping for ? extra 2% performance ?
>
>>to pppoe for better connection

>
> Although BT has indicated that it will/does support PPPoE, I don't know
> if this is currently the case. Certainly all that I've read since 2000
> has used PPPoA and I'd stick with what works if I were you :-) Peter


My Netgear DM602 seems to work fine on either setting (using Wanadoo - ye
gods what a stupid name..!), can't say I've noticed any difference.

Ivor


 
Reply With Quote
 
Black Shuck
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-06-2004, 05:54 PM
On 06/11/2004 12:59 Ivor Jones got up from the bar and shouted..:
> "Peter M" <us-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>>On 6 Nov 2004 in uk.telecom.broadband, Ian wrote:
>>
>>
>>>it is working fine on pppoa setting. Should I change this

>>
>>What change were you hoping for ? extra 2% performance ?
>>
>>
>>>to pppoe for better connection

>>
>>Although BT has indicated that it will/does support PPPoE, I don't know
>>if this is currently the case. Certainly all that I've read since 2000
>>has used PPPoA and I'd stick with what works if I were you :-) Peter

>
>
> My Netgear DM602 seems to work fine on either setting (using Wanadoo - ye
> gods what a stupid name..!), can't say I've noticed any difference.
>
> Ivor
>
>


Someone want to explain the difference? I'm on Plusnet, which should I
be using on my Draytek Vigor 2600We?


--
"This dog don't give a feck..."
 
Reply With Quote
 
Phil Thompson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-06-2004, 06:28 PM
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 18:54:34 +0000, Black Shuck
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Someone want to explain the difference? I'm on Plusnet, which should I
>be using on my Draytek Vigor 2600We?


PPPoA is what you want.

Point to Point Protocol is used over ATM

PPPoE is the same over ethernet, as BT use ATM to carry data on ADSL
you end up with PPPoEoA and lose 8 bytes per packet of extra overhead.

Phil
--
spamcop.net address commissioned 18/06/04
Come on down !
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PPPoA Vs PPPoE and router problems John Broadband 10 08-22-2007 05:10 PM
PPPoE works, PPPoA doesn't.. ? JohnK Broadband 14 04-25-2007 12:01 PM
BT Voyager 2100 ian@yellsie.wanadoo.co.uk Wireless Internet 0 07-14-2005 08:16 AM
BT Voyager 2100 Newsgroup 2004® Broadband 4 12-10-2004 05:39 PM
bt voyager 2100 Captain Broadband 1 10-11-2004 12:19 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11