Rob van der Putten <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Hi there
>
>"Floyd L. Davidson" wrote:
>
>> Anytime any program writes AT&W to the modem! Which is to say,
>> whenever you shoot yourself in the foot.
>
>Apart from shooting yourself in the foot.
That is a common problem though, which should not be either
ignored or assumed will not happen. With multiple applications
that each require a specific configuration in nvram, *someone*
has to *remember* all of them. Two years later, if someone
(else perhaps) decides to change the way just one of them works,
and sees what appears to be a basic change that should be
written to nvram... a foot gets shot off. And of course if
this is a business, where system administrators may change, that
is very likely and is *really* annoying.
>> Yes. And the need to change any one of them does not cause a
>> need to change all of them.
>
>> You have to do that *anyway*.
>
>Once vs for every program.
>Unless they all use a common config file.
No, once for *every* program. You just aren't going to find a
"common denominator" nvram configuration which is as common as
would be hoped for. Different modems, different programs,
etc. etc....
>> Yes, and no it is *not* necessarily imcompatible.
>
>Remember, there is no dial tone or ring signal.
>To avoid being hyjacked it's a good idea to disable the esc command
>(useally '+++'.
>It's best to disable AT commands alltogether.
That may be true, in /some/ situations... and not in others.
Your perception of Private Line usage may be limited to some
degree. I worked for an IXC for 34 years, my perception of
Private Line usage is that anything I think is "the" way, is
going to be done differenctly by the next guy that buys a PL.
:-)
Keep in mind that some uses for a Private Line modem might have
a modem connected to a computer, just like a dialup modem, and
it might be used by multiple applications with different
configuration needs, just as would a dialup modem. The only
difference is that there probably (though even this is not
necessarily true either) will never be a need for ring detection
or dial commands.
>> However, in cases where it is, there is also only one
>> application using the modem, hence nvram is has a very different
>> significance.
>
>> Trust me, it has been known for a lot longer than that.
>
>So are proper POR cirquits.
>I've never seen them in anything else then TVs.
What are "proper POR cirquits"?
>Most cirquits generate a reset on a fast rise of the supply voltage.
>The proper way of doing things is to check wether the supply voltage is
>high enough and generate a reset on a power low to power OK transition,
>regardsless of the speed at which the supply voltage rises.
What is the significance of that in relationship to using or not
using nvram configuration in a modem????
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
(E-Mail Removed)