On 27 Aug 2004 16:14:59 GMT,
(E-Mail Removed) (Walter
Roberson) wrote:
>In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
>Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>:The Mini-PCI card runs on 3.3 volts DC power.
>: Watts = Volts * Amps
>:In this case, just multiply the one expressed in MilliAmps times 3.3V
>:to equal milliwatts.
>A card that runs on 3.3 volts DC is supplied with 3.3V, but it does
>not necessarily -use- all of that power.
I beg to differ. The ratings that were in question are the power
consumption. Whether the radio turns the power into RF or smoke is of
no concern. The power is consumed (assuming a constant 3.3vdc input
voltage). If you look at the URL's previously posted, the power
consumption specs are broken down into standby, rx, tx, power save,
and such. Each has it's own power consumption level. With a constant
DC input voltage (3.3VDC), you can express power consumption in either
watts (milliwatts), or amps (milliamps).
Also, your statement of "a card runs on 3.3 volts DC.....but does not
necessarily -use- all of that power" is a misnomer. Power is measured
in watts, not volts. Are you suggesting that the card does not use
all that *VOLTAGE* or something similar? I hope not.
Also, not the title of "Power Consumption". That's consumption, not
power output.
>When it comes to radio
>transmissions, it might only use a fraction of that power for
>the transmittor, with whatever of the rest is used going into running
>the dsp/cpu/prom/whatever . Thus 3.3 V * the milliamps rating
>might give an unrealistically high power rating, perhaps even off by
>an order of magnitude.
There was no question in the original posting relating to power
efficiency or the method of regulation. As I read it, they were
interested in how much DC power (watts) the two cards burned during
normal operation in order to estimate or extend battery life.
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558