Hi
Bear in mind that though the same word Security is used to describe Secure
Internet Connection and Secure Wireless from a Computer functioning
perspective there is No relation between the two.
Wireless Security has Nothing to do with securing the Internet Connection.
Wireless is just a replacement for a Wire and thus can be intercepted by
people in the neighborhood attaching them self to your Signal and use your
LAN and your LAN's Internet Connection. To avoid Local Tapping there are
Wireless Security measures. These measures are unique to the Wireless
components, and have to be used even if there is No Internet Connection.
These short pages describe the basic principles of functional Wireless
Security.
Wireless Security -
http://www.ezlan.net/Wireless_Security.html
WEP, WPA, WPA2 -
http://www.ezlan.net/wpa_wep.html
Network Segregation -
http://www.ezlan.net/shield.html
Cable/DSL Router Hardware NAT and Firewall/AntiVirus/AntiSpy applications
are the ones that protect the Internet connection from being
invaded/infested, and preventing your LAN computers (Wired and Wireless)
from transmitting out to the Internet privileged information.
All the computers (as a Network) would have basic Internet protection by
using a Cable/DSL Router. In addition, each computer on your Network that
has access to the Internet should have its own Internet Connection
protection regardless of whether it uses Wire or Wireless.
Internet -Basic protection:
http://www.ezlan.net/firewall.html
Assemble Freeware Security suit for Internet Connection:
http://www.ezlan.net/security.html
Jack (MVP-Networking).
"Ari" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news

(E-Mail Removed)...
> Thanks James,
>
> Read your entire message and appreciate that you took the time to give
> me the information, thank you.
>
> The system here is a router with hardware firewall and each computer
> had Zone Alarm Free version. Without any software firewall running,
> the router firewall blocks everything is stealth'd on ALL ports.
>
> All of our computers get scanned one a week for spyware using spybot
> and ad-aware.
>
> We use AVG free virus scanner.
>
> Outlook, Outlook Express, MSN and Windows Messenger are removed from
> our hard drives.....they won't even get started by 'accident'.
>
> No software gets internet access unless it actually needs it, Bill's
> media player doesn't catalog my music or download album covers or
> organize playlists. It also doesn't acquire DRM licenses
> automatically::> No software gets automatic internet access except for
> Windows Update, the virus scanner, Eudora, Agent and a very few
> others.
>
> We removed Bill's Office suite, and now run Open Office.
>
> Internet Explorer has java script and activeX completely
> disabled....and, we use Firefox, not IE. IE is there because Bill
> Gates OS won't run without it. We use Eudora and Free Agent for email
> and newsgroup browsing.
>
> I'm thinking about removing the flash player, it seems to be almost
> exclusively used for third party advertising on websites anyway::>
>
> Real Audio and some other similar media type players have been
> removed, the scandal where Real Networks got caught red handed
> collecting data on users musical preferences as a basis for targeted
> advertising is still fresh in my mind::> Perhaps not a serious
> security risk, but certainly the music and audio/video I watch online
> or in my house is my business, and no one else's --your mileage might
> vary.
>
> The wireless network has file sharing disabled (in the properties for
> it).
>
> The desktop (hardwired to the router) has file sharing disabled in the
> LAN setup.
>
> The 'guest' account was renamed after creating another account, issued
> a strong password and then it was deleted.
>
> The sole administrator account is never logged in while connected to
> the internet. It uses a name other than admin or administrator. For
> example, it's name might be something like 'Chief1' or 'the_boss'.
> Password is VERY VERY strong.
>
> All users, including myself have strong passwords and are required to
> log in, but we have only limited privileges. None of the users have
> guess-able names, all names are at least 6 characters in length...for
> example, my user name isn't Ari, but it might be something like aarrii
> or iira11 or ..ari//.
>
> I'd like the wireless to be WPA, but, as you say I might be
> paranoid::> Acknowledged. Providing multiple hoops that intruders have
> to overcome to get into the system seems to be the standard
> practice-I'd like to have WPA be another barrier if possible. I'd like
> to have WPA2, but it seems a little premature at this time, I just
> read where Microsoft didn't even release WPA2 capable drivers until
> March of last year, and WPA2 routers are not exactly common even now.
>
> We have no top secret stuff on our system, but we take our internet
> seriously...especially the risks that we can control. My nine year old
> daughter is more internet savvy than all of the other kids in her
> class put together.
>
> If that's paranoid, well, then I guess I'm paranoid::>
>
> Again, thanks very much for taking the time to enlighten me regarding
> the wireless security issue.
>
> Regards,
>
> A
>
>
>
>>Ok, here's the real poop, as far i know it.
>>The way that it can only be cracked is by one specific packet that sends
>>the
>>one single part of the wep key unecrypted. If that one packet (which is
>>rarely transmitted on a home network) is sent enough times, litterally
>>thousands, the key can be decyphered. On a business network where
>>different
>>kinds of packeting and more complex systems are used, this one unecrypted
>>packet can be transmitted hundreds of times a day... where on a home
>>system
>>you're lucky if it's sent once a day. (where also in that FBI demo, they
>>probably set up for that packet to be transmitted constantly...)
>>Yes, it can be monitored if that person wanted to buy a $200 wireless
>>card,
>>and a good computer system to do the work. But you're likelyness of
>>someone
>>even thinking of hacking your network is slim to none, and slim left town!
>>Especially when they can drive down the road they can hack into a insecure
>>one and do whatever they want!! To be brutally honest, you're just
>>paranoid.
>>Second off, like you mentioned, anything you do online, like purchasing,
>>if
>>it's site is secured, then you're safe there! And nothing to worry about.
>>Third, to answer you most important question, if someone did hack into
>>your
>>network, and you had all your sharing shut off, you're pretty much safe.
>>Although, windows xp pro machines have (had) shared for administrative use
>>(I think) that if you didnt have an admin password, they were open. If you
>>really think you need more security, look into software firewalls...
>>this'll
>>only stop anything from people on the network from hacking your machine or
>>at least let you know if something is happening. But in most cases people
>>don't need personal software firewalls because the router can do this for
>>you, between you and the internet.
>>
>>Lastly, No one is going to hack you or even bother trying to hack if
>>you're
>>using WEP... it's too time consuming, and unless you had Top Secret data,
>>there is nothing to worry about.
>>
>>-James G.
>>
>>