Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Linux Networking > poptop vpn + redhat 9 + VLAN + routing problem

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

poptop vpn + redhat 9 + VLAN + routing problem

 
 
Steve Woolley
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-13-2003, 08:29 PM
I am running poptop v1.1.4-b4 on a Redhat 9 linux box with two
Broadcom gigabit ethernet interfaces -- one (eth0) as my public IP
interface and one (eth1) acting as a 802.1q VLAN trunk (vconfig) for
numerous 192.168.*.* private networks.

After connection from my Windows XP clients, they show the connections
as:
Authentication: MS CHAP V2
Encryption: MPPE 128
PPP Multilink Framing off

The PPTP VPN Server shows:
Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pptpd[6064]: CTRL: Client 64.33.91.244
control connection started
Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pptpd[6064]: CTRL: Starting call (launching
pppd, opening GRE)
Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pppd[6065]: pppd 2.4.2b3 started by root, uid
0
Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pppd[6065]: Using interface ppp1
Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pppd[6065]: Connect: ppp1 <--> /dev/pts/0
Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall /etc/hotplug/net.agent: assuming ppp1 is
already up
Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pptpd[6064]: GRE: Discarding duplicate packet
Dec 13 16:12:03 firewall pptpd[6064]: CTRL: Ignored a SET LINK INFO
packet with
real ACCMs!
Dec 13 16:12:04 firewall pptpd[6064]: CTRL: Ignored a SET LINK INFO
packet with
real ACCMs!
Dec 13 16:12:04 firewall pppd[6065]: CHAP peer authentication
succeeded for swoolley
Dec 13 16:12:05 firewall pppd[6065]: MPPE 128-bit stateless
compression enabled
Dec 13 16:12:08 firewall pppd[6065]: found interface vlan25 for proxy
arp
Dec 13 16:12:08 firewall pppd[6065]: local IP address 192.168.25.253
Dec 13 16:12:08 firewall pppd[6065]: remote IP address 192.168.25.1

my server /etc/pptpd.conf:
option /etc/ppp/options.pptpd
localip 192.168.25.253
listen 208.56.221.67
# no remoteip - this is set in chap-secrets

my server /etc/ppp/options.pptpd:
lock
debug
name pptpd
nobsdcomp
proxyarp
require-mschap-v2
require-mppe-128
nomppe-stateful

Everything looks great, I can not connect (ping,http,etc) local (to
the office network) IP addresses from the remote clients.

Server:

can ping 192.168.25.254 # itself
can ping 192.168.25.253 # vpn localip
can ping 192.168.25.1 # connected vpn client 1
can ping 192.168.25.2 # connected vpn client 2
can ping 192.168.25.5 # office server ip

Client 1:
can ping 192.168.25.254 # vpn server ip address
can ping 192.168.25.253 # vpn localip
can ping 192.168.25.1 # itself
can ping 192.168.25.2 # connected vpn client 2
CANNOT ping 192.168.25.5 # office server ip HERE IS THE PROBLEM

I have seen numerous somewhat similar problems (on newsgroups) that
involve setting the MTU/MRU size to 1350 (amd in some cases 1490) in
the /etc/ppp/options.pptp file. I tried various values with no
success. And I have never seen any MTU related or any other related
error messages in the log. I have also verified that IPTABLES is not
filtering any of this traffic.

Any ideas?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Danny
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-14-2003, 07:02 PM
> I am running poptop v1.1.4-b4 on a Redhat 9 linux box with two
> Broadcom gigabit ethernet interfaces -- one (eth0) as my public IP
> interface and one (eth1) acting as a 802.1q VLAN trunk (vconfig) for
> numerous 192.168.*.* private networks.
>
> After connection from my Windows XP clients, they show the connections
> as:
> Authentication: MS CHAP V2
> Encryption: MPPE 128
> PPP Multilink Framing off
>
> The PPTP VPN Server shows:
> Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pptpd[6064]: CTRL: Client 64.33.91.244
> control connection started
> Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pptpd[6064]: CTRL: Starting call (launching
> pppd, opening GRE)
> Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pppd[6065]: pppd 2.4.2b3 started by root, uid
> 0
> Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pppd[6065]: Using interface ppp1
> Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pppd[6065]: Connect: ppp1 <--> /dev/pts/0
> Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall /etc/hotplug/net.agent: assuming ppp1 is
> already up
> Dec 13 16:11:58 firewall pptpd[6064]: GRE: Discarding duplicate packet
> Dec 13 16:12:03 firewall pptpd[6064]: CTRL: Ignored a SET LINK INFO
> packet with
> real ACCMs!
> Dec 13 16:12:04 firewall pptpd[6064]: CTRL: Ignored a SET LINK INFO
> packet with
> real ACCMs!
> Dec 13 16:12:04 firewall pppd[6065]: CHAP peer authentication
> succeeded for swoolley
> Dec 13 16:12:05 firewall pppd[6065]: MPPE 128-bit stateless
> compression enabled
> Dec 13 16:12:08 firewall pppd[6065]: found interface vlan25 for proxy
> arp
> Dec 13 16:12:08 firewall pppd[6065]: local IP address 192.168.25.253
> Dec 13 16:12:08 firewall pppd[6065]: remote IP address 192.168.25.1
>
> my server /etc/pptpd.conf:
> option /etc/ppp/options.pptpd
> localip 192.168.25.253
> listen 208.56.221.67
> # no remoteip - this is set in chap-secrets
>
> my server /etc/ppp/options.pptpd:
> lock
> debug
> name pptpd
> nobsdcomp
> proxyarp
> require-mschap-v2
> require-mppe-128
> nomppe-stateful
>
> Everything looks great, I can not connect (ping,http,etc) local (to
> the office network) IP addresses from the remote clients.
>
> Server:
>
> can ping 192.168.25.254 # itself
> can ping 192.168.25.253 # vpn localip
> can ping 192.168.25.1 # connected vpn client 1
> can ping 192.168.25.2 # connected vpn client 2
> can ping 192.168.25.5 # office server ip
>
> Client 1:
> can ping 192.168.25.254 # vpn server ip address
> can ping 192.168.25.253 # vpn localip
> can ping 192.168.25.1 # itself
> can ping 192.168.25.2 # connected vpn client 2
> CANNOT ping 192.168.25.5 # office server ip HERE IS THE PROBLEM
>
> I have seen numerous somewhat similar problems (on newsgroups) that
> involve setting the MTU/MRU size to 1350 (amd in some cases 1490) in
> the /etc/ppp/options.pptp file. I tried various values with no
> success. And I have never seen any MTU related or any other related
> error messages in the log. I have also verified that IPTABLES is not
> filtering any of this traffic.
>


Did you enable forwarding?


 
Reply With Quote
 
joe
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-04-2004, 09:55 PM

i have a similar problem. i just posted another message. i enable
forwarding by using
iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s 10.0.1.0/24 -j MASQUERADE
and that did not work
so i also tried
sbin/iptables -I FORWARD -d 10.1.1.0/24 -j ACCEPT


/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 10.1.1.9 -d 0/0 -j DNAT --to
10.1.1.0/24
well any ideas?

i am testing the server connecting throu a alias interface that get assign
and ip address in the clients subnet.
10.0.1.x local network clients
10.1.1.9 vpn server
10.1.1.2 my ip
10.0.1.22 my ip after i am connected to the vpn

i want to set up the server to work with out the alias ip but for now an
alias makes it easier to troubleshoot why i cant connect from the internet
to the local lan.


>


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VLAN routing issues jonathantpage@gmail.com Linux Networking 7 02-05-2009 11:55 PM
redhat FC8 routing problem Matthew Shelton Linux Networking 4 02-02-2008 03:09 AM
How to Configure Inter-VLAN Routing on a Cisco Router Mohammed Alani Network Routers 0 04-17-2007 08:39 AM
Change Linux VLAN/Gateway Routing to a Layer 3 Jacob Linux Networking 0 03-10-2006 04:13 PM
inter vlan routing joe Linux Networking 1 04-01-2005 08:16 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11