On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:19:39 +0000, Mark McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:53:28 -0000, in uk.telecom.broadband , "Gonz"
> <T o p @ S e c r e t . c o m> wrote:
>
>>
>>"john" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>
>>> "Gonz" <T o p @ S e c r e t . c o m> wrote in message
>>> news:Q%6Vi.7282$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>
)
>>> this nature."
>>>>
>>>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...nternet125.xml
>>>
>>> Please read the article and get it right! The police called at two
>>> homes.
>>
>>Computer equipment and documentation seized from his home, his place of
>>work and his father's home in Cheshire
>>
>>Oops... we seem to have missed *his place of work*
>
> So the police visited his desk and checked out his computer.
If they did that then they raided some small part of VM. He was an
employee and not a contractor from outside brought in temporarily?
> They did
> ***not*** raid VM as your headline exceptionally misleadingly implied.
> Heck, you can't even lie properly.
It was an exaggeration i think.
--
___ _______ ___ ___ ___ __ ____
/ _ \/ __/ _ | / _ \ / _ \/ _ |/ / / / /
/ // / _// __ |/ // / / ___/ __ / /_/ / /__
/____/___/_/ |_/____/ /_/ /_/ |_\____/____/