>>Another example of paranoia about mobile mast radiation. No no and again
>>no!
>
> I think it was a reasonable question. To accuse anyone who has any
> questions about possible downsides of microwave radiation of being
> paranoid seems a bit extreme.
Nothing like as extreme as the total claptrap talked about radiation from
mobile phone masts by most of the press and public! The public paranoia
about them is analogous to the witchcraft trials in Salem and has just as
much scientific basis. Some very simple physics will show that the
radiation level that individuals, or equipment, is subject to from the
transmitters on a mobile phone mast is much lower than that they receive
from the handset. It is established fact that radiation levels decrease
according to the inverse square law. Simply put this means that the
radiation level is reduced by the square of the reduction in distance. Take
a look at
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consumer_gui...t_info?a=87101
for details of the audit being done on mobile phone radiation levels at
sensitive sites like schools and hospitals. These show that levels are so
low as to be insignificant. The highest level so far recorded being 1/279
the recognised safe level. If there is a danger from higher levels then
people should be paying attention to the proximity of their handsets not the
masts.