The Plusnet pipe of doom and the users (OH DEAR!)

Well it looks SO FAR that I was right with regards to the heavy users
ending up being limited in speed terms, and contended take a look at...
http://tinyurl.co.uk/o2kz
The funniest quote IMO is about the "bedding in" process LMFAO sorry PN
(and Ian) but first no GB figure was given to users to reduce their usage
to and now that comment, WTF?
While I freely admit you may be working on any issues that have occurred
due to the moving of users to different pipes, I don't think in a
reputation state things like this will do you any good either now or in the
future, I suspect your phone lines will/are being inundated with unhappy
users, who want it sorted at the least and want a MAC code at the worse.
Im certainly happy I aint a PN user at this moment in time, and with more
and more ISPs now running BTs trial 2mb service I suspect you might lose
more than a few users over this latest episode ((

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:33:09 UTC, "Dave" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

> I don't think in a
> reputation state things like this will do you any good either now or in the
> future

What on earth do these mangled words mean?

> I suspect your phone lines will/are being inundated with unhappy
> users, who want it sorted at the least and want a MAC code at the worse.

'least' is opposite to 'worse' in your juvenile world?

> Im certainly happy I aint a PN user at this moment in time, and with more
> and more ISPs now running BTs trial 2mb service I suspect you might lose
> more than a few users over this latest episode ((

I had no idea they were trialling a 2 millibit service.

--
Bob Eager
begin a new life...dump Windows!

On 29 Nov 2004 20:18:52 GMT, "Bob Eager" <(E-Mail Removed)> strung
together this:

>I had no idea they were trialling a 2 millibit service.

Apparently Tiscali are at the forefront of it all....
--

SJW
A.C.S. Ltd
Please reply to group or use 'usenet' in email subject

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:25:14 UTC, Lurch <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

> On 29 Nov 2004 20:18:52 GMT, "Bob Eager" <(E-Mail Removed)> strung
> together this:
>
> >I had no idea they were trialling a 2 millibit service.
>
> Apparently Tiscali are at the forefront of it all....

So I believe. Although someone else leaked it a couple of weeks ago...!
--
Bob Eager
begin a new life...dump Windows!

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:25:14 +0000, Lurch
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On 29 Nov 2004 20:18:52 GMT, "Bob Eager" <(E-Mail Removed)> strung
>together this:
>
>>I had no idea they were trialling a 2 millibit service.
>
>Apparently Tiscali are at the forefront of it all....

Are you sure you are not referring to the Tiscali 2µb service....same
price but even 10¯³ slower


Ian

"Bob Eager" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:176uZD2KcidF-pn2-(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:33:09 UTC, "Dave" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't think in a
> > reputation state things like this will do you any good either now or in
the
> > future
>
> What on earth do these mangled words mean?

Oh the insults of language again, Very original you dumb fanboy
ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz

Look at the fanboys go LMFAO.............ATTACK, ATTACK, LOL *over and
over*

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:48:37 -0000, "Dave" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>Look at the fanboys go LMFAO.............ATTACK, ATTACK, LOL *over and
>over*

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

Were you /really/ LOL'ing, Dave? You LOL at lot. Were you also LYAO?

"Richard Sobey" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:48:37 -0000, "Dave" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
> >Look at the fanboys go LMFAO.............ATTACK, ATTACK, LOL *over and
> >over*
>
> LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
>
> Were you /really/ LOL'ing, Dave? You LOL at lot. Were you also LYAO?

Erm "LOL'ing"??????????

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:47:32 -0000, "Dave" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:
>
>"Bob Eager" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:176uZD2KcidF-pn2-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:33:09 UTC, "Dave" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I don't think in a
>> > reputation state things like this will do you any good either now or in the
>> > future
>>
>> What on earth do these mangled words mean?
>
>Oh the insults of language again,

If you managed to post in english, perhaps we wouldn't be able to take
the piss. Your comment above is utterly incomprehensible.