Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Linux Networking > Ping

Reply
 
 
kajo-95
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-26-2005, 10:59 AM
Hello to everybody,
I'd like to ask you to explain me what is the reason to use the -l option
with ping command. What should be the result of this command and how to
interpret result. What can say the result of command : ping -l 1000 -c 20
ip_addr if you observe 90 % of lost packets is it normal situation?
Thanks for all suggestions, regards.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Trygve Selmer
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-26-2005, 11:05 AM
kajo-95 wrote:
> Hello to everybody,
> I'd like to ask you to explain me what is the reason to use the -l option
> with ping command. What should be the result of this command and how to
> interpret result. What can say the result of command : ping -l 1000 -c 20
> ip_addr if you observe 90 % of lost packets is it normal situation?
> Thanks for all suggestions, regards.


You ask ping to send 1000 packets as fast as it can, you also limit the
number of packets to 20 before ping exits. In my book this will give 20
replies for 1000 transmitted, ie packet loss of 98%.

 
Reply With Quote
 
James Knott
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-26-2005, 11:52 AM
kajo-95 wrote:

> Hello to everybody,
> I'd like to ask you to explain me what is the reason to use the -l option
> with ping command. What should be the result of this command and how to
> interpret result. What can say the result of command : ping -l 1000 -c 20
> ip_addr if you observe 90 % of lost packets is it normal situation?
> Thanks for all suggestions, regards.


That option allows you to send out several pings in quick succession,
without waiting for a reply. This could be used for testing for congestion
etc. Normally, ping is sent one packet at a time with a wait in between
for a reply.

Why does this sound like a homework question?

 
Reply With Quote
 
kajo-95
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-26-2005, 09:17 PM
Dnia Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:05:38 +0200, Trygve Selmer napisa³(a):

> kajo-95 wrote:
>> Hello to everybody,
>> I'd like to ask you to explain me what is the reason to use the -l option
>> with ping command. What should be the result of this command and how to
>> interpret result. What can say the result of command : ping -l 1000 -c 20
>> ip_addr if you observe 90 % of lost packets is it normal situation?
>> Thanks for all suggestions, regards.

>
> You ask ping to send 1000 packets as fast as it can, you also limit the
> number of packets to 20 before ping exits. In my book this will give 20
> replies for 1000 transmitted, ie packet loss of 98%.


OK I understand It was mistaken I understood the -c option different way.
Now everything is clear. Thanks a lot
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When Client Ping DC not respond,but when DC ping clients they resp ahmad Windows Networking 3 07-17-2007 07:44 PM
Ping 224.0.0.2 ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted interessato@gmail.com Linux Networking 4 01-24-2006 02:47 AM
Ping from cron not having same effect as ping from console Dean Schulze Linux Networking 2 02-24-2004 08:10 PM
Some services working but can't ping (not ping-able) Micah Elliott Linux Networking 1 12-05-2003 09:47 AM
Windows ping and Linux ping command? tom Linux Networking 5 11-10-2003 08:52 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11