vibhash chandra jha wrote:
>I have very less knowledge of networks but..
>While pinging 10.3.255.255 result was found to be as..
>
>PING 10.3.255.255 (10.3.255.255) from 202.141.82.163 : 56(84) bytes of data.
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=3.953 msec
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=4.302 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.65: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=701 usec
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.60: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.004 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.60: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.270 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.65: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.402 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.584 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.34: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.758 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.891 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.34: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=2.065 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.87: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=2.144 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.78: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=2.220 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.87: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=2.295 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.78: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=2.370 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.0.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=2.446 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.0.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=2.521 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.398 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.900 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.65: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=814 usec
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.60: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=1.147 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.65: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=1.337 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.60: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=1.513 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=1.642 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=1.824 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.34: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=2.000 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.34: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=2.086 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.78: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=2.164 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.87: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=2.239 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.78: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=2.314 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.87: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=2.390 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.0.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=2.465 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.0.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=2.541 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=3.705 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=4.220 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.65: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=717 usec
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.60: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=1.018 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.65: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=1.208 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.60: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=1.388 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=1.515 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=1.693 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.34: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=1.866 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.34: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=1.996 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.87: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=2.076 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.78: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=2.153 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.87: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=2.228 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.0.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=2.304 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.78: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=2.379 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.0.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=2.454 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.944 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=3.465 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.65: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=733 usec
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.12: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=1.087 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.60: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=1.222 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.65: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=1.402 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.12: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=1.580 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.60: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=1.707 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.34: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=1.888 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.34: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=2.019 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.78: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=2.098 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.87: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=2.175 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.0.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=2.251 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.78: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=2.326 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.87: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=2.594 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.0.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=2.680 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=3.177 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=3.626 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.65: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=800 usec
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.60: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=1.121 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.65: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=1.302 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.1.60: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=1.430 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.12: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=1.613 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.34: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=1.788 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.34: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=1.919 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.12: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=2.049 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.78: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=2.129 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.87: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=2.206 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.78: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=2.282 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.2.87: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=2.357 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.0.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=2.433 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.1.0.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=2.509 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=3.387 msec (DUP!)
>64 bytes from 10.0.0.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=3.851 msec (DUP!)
>
>--- 10.3.255.255 ping statistics ---
>6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, +76 duplicates, 0% packet loss
>round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 0.701/2.106/4.302/0.825 ms
>
>
>
>Why the response is coming from other ip's other than 10.3.255.255 ??
>what can be be the reason??
>
>Vibhash
>
>
10.3.255.255 is a broad cast address, so any address below 10.4.0.0
would answer.
|
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
