On 01 May 2005 10:18:38 GMT, cw <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>As far as I can see this is a complete non issue. If you want to ping
>test to verify that your adapter is working - do it from another computer
>which you have already said works.
>On the laptop itself, all the 192.168.254.36 ping does is redirect to
>127.0.0.1 so just ping that. Either way, that only proves that the
>loopback is working, not the NIC connection to the outside world. The
>only way to do that is to ping from another computer.
>
>I can only assume that Norton is stopping the redirect to 127.0.0.1 based
>on a security principal from ingress/egress policies.
>
>Logically, all traffic coming in on the 192.168.254.36 address *should*
>being coming from the wire and being passed to the computer's stack for
>processing.
>
>Norton is seeing traffic coming not from the wire but from the stack and
>saying "hold on a minute, that's not supposed to happen". Therefore it
>blocks it.
>
>If for some reason you think you still need this 'feature/bug' then you
>go delve into the firewall rules and explicitly allow ping from all
>addresses, not just the trusted network.
Many thanks to Peter M and cw for their responses. As requested I have
changed my line length to 78, I suppose the 100 was a default but the change
makes no difference to me, so happy to oblige.
As for pinging yourself I was not aware of any "problems" until I used the
Network Diagnostics of Xp Pro which reported that the Network Adaptor had
FAILED; paging down the results there is another line that reads:
IP ADDRESS = 192.168.254.36 (FAILED) so it was not unreasonable to believe a
problem existed and, as already stated, was tracked down to NIS being
installed on the laptop. A pretty extensive delve into the firewall rules
indicated to me that other than turning off the firewall, ping results for
your own IP would not be resolved.
To my simple mind we have a bug here, either the software for Network
Diagnostics needs tweaking by Bill Gates or NIS should be changed so that it
allows self pinging of your own IP number. A non issue this maybe but
demonstrates how flaky software can be to cause unnecessary alarm and
despondency.
David Bradley
|