Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > Performance under mapping or using canonical name

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Performance under mapping or using canonical name

 
 
Raymond
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-04-2009, 04:06 PM
Hi,

We have a windows 2003 server acting as a file server. And we have a set of
systems accessing the file server with read and write operations. Some systems
have drive mapping to the shares on the file server.

I would like to find information about the performance difference between
using
drive mapping to a file share or using direct access with canonical name.
Which one is better? and stable?

If you have any experience about this, please kindly share with me.

THanks a lot,
Raymond
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mapping pc fa Fred Loh Windows Networking 1 11-28-2008 07:41 PM
Mapping to DC DS Windows Networking 3 04-29-2006 04:53 PM
NAT: 1-1 mapping from 192.168.x.x to 10.168.x.x ? Stefano Masini Linux Networking 1 09-01-2004 01:26 AM
Mapping dgrohowski@agcchem.com Windows Networking 0 01-20-2004 02:17 PM
Mapping ruben armas Windows Networking 0 07-07-2003 04:43 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11