Colin wrote:
>> Do I believe this or all the posts on this site?
>> PlusNet hardly seems to be as bad as the posts would suggest,
>> particularly
>> as the winner, Zen costs a lot more.
>> But then surveys like these are useless without taking cost into account.
>> Its like comparing a Mini with a Rolls Royce and ignoring the price
>> difference.
>>
>> Retired
>
>
> LOL. Your trolling is good. You just have to remember the way Plusnet
> tried
> to bribe punters with fake gifts to win this poll (evidence is on ADSL
> Guide) and then realise what a dirty dishonest outfit Plusnet are.
>
> Zen won it fair and square *again* without dirty tricks and lies from
> their
> company reps, like thugs from Plusnet ... Norriss, Tomlinson, Brown and
> co.
>
> My God... I hate Plusnet with a passion. for their ongoing bare faced lies
> and deceit to customers 
>
> LOL
I dont hate plusnet, I migrated to their premier service, as I thought it
was unlimited (within reason), some months i might download 10gb, some
months 75gb, I dont want to have a restriction, and plusnet seemed to have
the right package for me.
There speeds now, since Christmas are like dialup, getting only full
broadband after 1am. I am on a new billing month as of yesterday, yet my max
p2p speeds download at the moment are about 11k. I am migrating to eclipse
tomorrow.
I understand their need to have a cap, but at the moment their procedure to
limit is absurd, they have two seperate systems, using two seperate
defintions of offpeak, with an array of catches, and no clear way to show
what you have downloaded, and what limits are currently on.
Gaz