On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:10:48 +0000 (UTC),
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>meATprivacyDOTnet <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> On 12/17/04 3:54 PM, meATprivacyDOTnet wrote:
>
>>> The parabolic antenna coax cable is rather short, so I'll have to put
>>> the AP sealed box on the pole, just behind the parabolic antenna, maybe
>>> even in the same orizontal line of the illuminator.
>>>
>>> Here is a PDF document containing a picture of the parabolica antenna:
>>> <http://www.stelladoradus.com/pdfs/2.4/parabolic/grid/24%20SD24.pdf>
>>>
>>> Will there be any problem for the radio signal or anything
>>> (interference, noise, etc.) in such installation?
>
>> Any help?
>I thought Jeff would leap at this one. You're doing what he recommends,
>putting the radio outdoors with the antenna.
Sorry. I forgot to answer.
There's no problem with putting the radio in a box behind the dish on
the pole. That's the most common location. There are some
environmental concerns which I don't wanna go into right now. Use a
drain hole *OR* pressurize the box. Paint it white to avoid solar
meltdown. Heat sinks conducting heat to the outside are a good idea.
However, I did get a suprise from one such installation. The Orinoco
radio part of the cheap router (AP1000) was not RF shielded. The
radio in the plastic PVC elecrtrical box was picking up interference
from a nearby access point located behind the dish. I determined the
cause of the problem with the traditional aluminium temporary foil
shield. The plan was to replace the aluminium foil and electrical
tape wrapped plastic box with a proper metal box. However, the owner
was cheap and has left the foil in place for about 6 months so far. I
haven't seen it but he also notes that some of the other wireless
boxes on the rooftop are now sporting aluminium foil gift wrapping.
Anyway, put some effort into shielding if you're in a RF polluted
area.
>I dont' seem to come up with a good reference in this group, but I did see
>a good writeup quite a while ago.
>
>You don't want a completely sealed box... I don't think.
>There should be a "weep" hole at the bottom to allow for thermal changes,
>both ambient and equipment caused. In a bad weather environment, you might
>cover it with Goretex, but a small hole facing down is probably okay.
I always wanted to put a small umbrella over the access point.
I don't think Goretex will do anything useful. The problem is
condensation, not precipitation. The heat from the inside electronics
will help with condensation, but not in a "sealed" box full of
moisture loaded air. There has to be some place for the water to go
(or pressurize plus dessicate and not worry about it).
>Craig's is a long link, with good mapping detail.
>http://www.craig-bartell.com/
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558