Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Linux Networking > packet checksum

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

packet checksum

 
 
C.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-17-2003, 09:27 AM

Hi !

Each time a packet pass through a firewall (forward rules), its checksum
is re-calculated by the kernel, thus killing the firewall performances.

Is there a way to deactivate this re-calculation ?

Thanks !

C.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Phil Frisbie, Jr.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-17-2003, 03:38 PM
C. wrote:

>
> Hi !
>
> Each time a packet pass through a firewall (forward rules), its checksum
> is re-calculated by the kernel, thus killing the firewall performances.
>
> Is there a way to deactivate this re-calculation ?


Don't use NAT? Because NAT changes the destination IP address the router MUST
recalculate the checksum. However, calculating a checksum is not very CPU
intensive, unless you are running on an old '386

> Thanks !
>
> C.
>


--
Phil Frisbie, Jr.
Hawk Software
http://www.hawksoft.com

 
Reply With Quote
 
C.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-20-2003, 09:14 AM

> Don't use NAT? Because NAT changes the destination IP address the router
> MUST recalculate the checksum.


No NAT at this time, the firewall acts like a regular ethernet bridge.
The TTL must be decreased, therefore the checksum must also be
recalculated...


> However, calculating a checksum is not very CPU intensive, unless you are
> running on an old '386


Well...it seems to be quite intensive when Gigabit Ethernet NICs are in
use (I should have mentionned that before ), that's why I'd like to
get rid of checksum...

Any idea ?

Thanks

C.

 
Reply With Quote
 
James Knott
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-20-2003, 10:45 AM
C. wrote:

> Well...it seems to be quite intensive when Gigabit Ethernet NICs are in
> use (I should have mentionned that before ), that's why I'd like to
> get rid of checksum...
>
> Any idea ?
>


Checksums are part of the package. You can't get rid of them.

--

Fundamentalism is fundamentally wrong.

To reply to this message, replace everything to the left of "@" with
james.knott.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CRC checksum FCS SaranJothy Linux Networking 0 04-30-2007 09:45 AM
How to Distinguish between a reset packet and a normal packet sairam Linux Networking 4 03-27-2007 04:03 AM
Receiver sensitivity- Packet Detection v/s Packet capture Vinay Wireless Internet 1 10-14-2005 01:50 AM
How to handle TCP checksum, if adapter support TCP checksum offloading? Rajesh Gupta Windows Networking 0 08-02-2004 11:20 PM
What is "Down Poll Rate", "Rx Checksum Offload" and "Tx Checksum Offload"? Jerry Windows Networking 0 11-26-2003 12:39 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11