> Don't use NAT? Because NAT changes the destination IP address the router
> MUST recalculate the checksum.
No NAT at this time, the firewall acts like a regular ethernet bridge.
The TTL must be decreased, therefore the checksum must also be
recalculated...
> However, calculating a checksum is not very CPU intensive, unless you are
> running on an old '386
Well...it seems to be quite intensive when Gigabit Ethernet NICs are in
use (I should have mentionned that before

), that's why I'd like to
get rid of checksum...
Any idea ?
Thanks
C.