Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > OT - Legality of recording TV to timeshift.

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

OT - Legality of recording TV to timeshift.

 
 
Ian Stirling
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-09-2004, 01:14 PM
Is this actually spelled out in legislation?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Alec McKenzie
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-09-2004, 01:28 PM
Ian Stirling <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> Is this actually spelled out in legislation?


I have the impression that legislation tends to spell out illegalities
(legalities go by default), except for cases where the legislation is
revoking earlier legislation.

--
Alec McKenzie
(E-Mail Removed)
 
Reply With Quote
 
Graham
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-09-2004, 03:39 PM

"Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:c9qnc.1167$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Is this actually spelled out in legislation?



Of course you understand that our legal system is comprised of "Case Law",
(the Judges make it up as they go along).

If a broadcaster did try and take you to Court however I don't think he
would have a proverbial to stand on.
In defence you would ask him, if you weren't encouraging people to record
programmes,
Why do (did) you supply EPG data for Sky Plus (& TiVo)?
& Provide PDC signals?

Graham.






 
Reply With Quote
 
nsj
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-09-2004, 03:56 PM
Ian Stirling wrote:

> Is this actually spelled out in legislation?


It is legal to record for time-shifting purposes, up to a maximum time of 90
days.

--
Now Playing: Fun Boy 3 - Our Lips Are Sealed [192kbps mp3]
 
Reply With Quote
 
Dave Gibson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-09-2004, 04:01 PM

"nsj" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Ian Stirling wrote:
>
> > Is this actually spelled out in legislation?

>
> It is legal to record for time-shifting purposes, up to a maximum time of

90
> days.
>
> --


90 days from when?

Is my recording of the 1953 Coronation illegal? (recorded say 60 days ago).

Is it ok to record old repeats?

Dave


 
Reply With Quote
 
Ian Stirling
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-09-2004, 05:07 PM
nsj <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Ian Stirling wrote:
>
>> Is this actually spelled out in legislation?

>
> It is legal to record for time-shifting purposes, up to a maximum time of 90
> days.


Can you point me at an actual act of parliment, or other law that says
this?
 
Reply With Quote
 
Alastair
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-09-2004, 08:43 PM
"Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:0ztnc.1202$(E-Mail Removed)...
> nsj <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > Ian Stirling wrote:
> >
> >> Is this actually spelled out in legislation?

> >
> > It is legal to record for time-shifting purposes, up to a maximum time

of 90
> > days.

>
> Can you point me at an actual act of parliment, or other law that says
> this?


Can you not use Google then?

"70. The making for private and domestic use of a recording of a
broadcast or cable programme solely for the purpose of enabling it to be
viewed or listened to at a more convenient time does not infringe any
copyright in the broadcast or cable programme or in any work included in
it."

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988

http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1988...80048_en_1.htm





 
Reply With Quote
 
Ian Stirling
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-09-2004, 08:46 PM
Alastair <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> "Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:0ztnc.1202$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> nsj <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> > Ian Stirling wrote:
>> >
>> >> Is this actually spelled out in legislation?
>> >
>> > It is legal to record for time-shifting purposes, up to a maximum time

> of 90
>> > days.

>>
>> Can you point me at an actual act of parliment, or other law that says
>> this?

>
> Can you not use Google then?


I can use google, I was apparenly hitting the wrong keywords.
>
> "70. The making for private and domestic use of a recording of a
> broadcast or cable programme solely for the purpose of enabling it to be
> viewed or listened to at a more convenient time does not infringe any
> copyright in the broadcast or cable programme or in any work included in
> it."
>
> Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
>
> http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1988...80048_en_1.htm
>
>
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Ian Stirling
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-09-2004, 09:06 PM
Alastair <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> "Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:0ztnc.1202$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> nsj <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> > Ian Stirling wrote:
>> >
>> >> Is this actually spelled out in legislation?
>> >
>> > It is legal to record for time-shifting purposes, up to a maximum time

> of 90
>> > days.

>>
>> Can you point me at an actual act of parliment, or other law that says
>> this?

>
> Can you not use Google then?
>
> "70. The making for private and domestic use of a recording of a
> broadcast or cable programme solely for the purpose of enabling it to be
> viewed or listened to at a more convenient time does not infringe any
> copyright in the broadcast or cable programme or in any work included in
> it."


Interesting.
This would not seem to require you to own the recorder, or even to
pick the programs in advance.

It would seem easy to argue that there is nothing prohibiting the
setting up of a service that recorded programs for users, and let them
play them back later.

The hard part would be proving that users of this service had legitimate
access to the programs.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jonathan Buzzard
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-09-2004, 10:20 PM
On Sun, 09 May 2004 21:06:19 +0000, Ian Stirling wrote:

> Alastair <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> "Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:0ztnc.1202$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> nsj <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> > Ian Stirling wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Is this actually spelled out in legislation?
>>> >
>>> > It is legal to record for time-shifting purposes, up to a maximum time

>> of 90
>>> > days.
>>>
>>> Can you point me at an actual act of parliment, or other law that says
>>> this?

>>
>> Can you not use Google then?
>>
>> "70. The making for private and domestic use of a recording of a
>> broadcast or cable programme solely for the purpose of enabling it to be
>> viewed or listened to at a more convenient time does not infringe any
>> copyright in the broadcast or cable programme or in any work included in
>> it."

>
> Interesting.
> This would not seem to require you to own the recorder, or even to
> pick the programs in advance.
>
> It would seem easy to argue that there is nothing prohibiting the
> setting up of a service that recorded programs for users, and let them
> play them back later.
>
> The hard part would be proving that users of this service had legitimate
> access to the programs.


What you are forgetting is that there is a shed load of more recent
legislation that updates this. You need to pick through about three
more Acts of Parliament and a dozen statutory instruments to get the
full picture.

JAB.

--
Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
Northumberland, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 1661-832195

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recording and editing Internet radio Michael Chare Broadband 7 04-10-2008 11:11 AM
weird vcr recording from ntl/virgin 'pick of the week' spamlet Broadband 3 03-15-2007 08:35 PM
Legality & security of wireless networks thoughtcat@gmail.com Broadband 11 03-08-2006 12:52 PM
Stupid newbie question about legality anern Wireless Internet 55 05-21-2005 07:43 PM
Recording a phone call freelancer Broadband 14 05-02-2004 06:21 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11