Nash <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Valentin Guillen <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
>> Nash wrote:
>> > Rated at 7.5dBi
>> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...category=40992
>>
>> The antenna listed above is designed to be used when mounted on a metal
>> car body. If used on anything else, the antenna doesn't have the "gound
>> plane" which it is designed to work ON. It will then NOT have the gain
>> nor the propagation characteristics it was designed to have.
>> > I also see a few Orinoco range extenders rated at 2.5dBi, am I better
>> > off with these given that they are made by Orinoco?
>> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...category=61816
> Thanks Valentine. Looks like the Orinoco is the better bet.
I wouldn't say that! 7.5dbi minus some loss, is probably still not below
2.5dbi, which is pretty much the standard rubber duckie antenna from any
router or usb-802.11 adapter.
I have the 5dbi version of the antenna you noted first.
On the roof of my car, it provides more consistent coverage, but not
necessarily greater range. Stuck upside down to my passenger door frame,
it seems to work just as well. I would think that at best this is a poor
half/groundplane off the bottom isde of the car roof.
Stuck to the whiteboard in my office, I get signal from the backside of the
whiteboard better than without the antenna. On top of a metal filing
cabinet, it does well, but not really a lot of difference.
In my case, I think the tiny cable offsets the gain.
http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/re05u.php
--
---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8-122.5