Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer, scientists believe

In article <fb79tv$h39$(E-Mail Removed)>, lenny <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer, scientists believe

No, that is not what scientists believe. Either you or the Daily Mail
is making it up.

-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.

It will be interesting to see how this one plays out:


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...0&in_a_source=

Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer, scientists believe

If it were true, then most of the world would have Cancer, and dependant on
the current percentage of terminal cancer, the world population would be in
a rapid decline

In article <fb79k5$ls4$(E-Mail Removed)>, Richard Tobin
<(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>>Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer, scientists believe
>
>No, that is not what scientists believe. Either you or the Daily Mail
>is making it up.

This is bad for you, that is bad for you, perhaps at birth we should be
sealed in an airtight box pumped with scrubbed oxygen and fed with safe
irradiated nutrients intravenously.

If all the scientific experts were laid end to end we could run over the
bastards with a road roller.

Life's a bitch and then you die, some sooner than others.

Mike

--
Michael Swift We do not regard Englishmen as foreigners.
Kirkheaton We look on them only as rather mad Norwegians.
Yorkshire Halvard Lange

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, (E-Mail Removed)
says...
> In article <fb79k5$ls4$(E-Mail Removed)>, Richard Tobin
> <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
> >>Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer, scientists believe
> >
> >No, that is not what scientists believe. Either you or the Daily Mail
> >is making it up.
>
> This is bad for you, that is bad for you, perhaps at birth we should be
> sealed in an airtight box pumped with scrubbed oxygen and fed with safe
> irradiated nutrients intravenously.
>
A better plan would be to never read some of the absurd shite that is
printed in the Daily Mail. That said, I found a Brass Eye moment in the
Telegraph a few days ago when it reported that churches were considering
allowing mobile phone masts to be placed on spires even though they
could be used to transmit pornography to children!

In the interest of balanced, non hysterical reporting, they appear to
have forgotten to mention that this coverage could enable ambulances to
be called for stab victims etc.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Michael Swift" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)
: : In article <fb79k5$ls4$(E-Mail Removed)>,
: : Richard Tobin <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
: : : : Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer,
: : : : scientists believe
: : :
: : : No, that is not what scientists believe. Either you
: : : or the Daily Mail is making it up.
: :
: : This is bad for you, that is bad for you, perhaps at
: : birth we should be sealed in an airtight box pumped
: : with scrubbed oxygen and fed with safe irradiated
: : nutrients intravenously.

Ooh, not irradiated, Lenny wouldn't like that..!

: : If all the scientific experts were laid end to end we
: : could run over the bastards with a road roller.
: :
: : Life's a bitch and then you die, some sooner than
: : others.

And some not soon enough.


Ivor

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:31:19 +0100, Michael Swift <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>If all the scientific experts were laid end to end we could run over the
>bastards with a road roller.

Mike

your eloquence is breath taking.

Thank you for that morsel of wisdom and so well put!!!

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:34:13 +0000, Richard Tobin wrote:

> In article <fb79tv$h39$(E-Mail Removed)>, lenny <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>>Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer, scientists believe
>
> No, that is not what scientists believe. Either you or the Daily Mail is
> making it up.
>
> -- Richard

don't forget to take your pills.

"lenny" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:fb79tv$h39$(E-Mail Removed)...
> It will be interesting to see how this one plays out:
>
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...0&in_a_source=
>
> Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer, scientists believe
>

Sorry, no time to read articles via links, if you have something to say then
please give your opinion here. Scientists and research groups will say
anything for funding. What they say depends on how big the fund is and how
long they can get away with being paid to "research". Isn't it amazing how
there are no cases were radiation from a mobile has been proved as a cause
of death. Not even amongst radio engineers.
People were suffering with cancer well before mobile phones. That must
annoy the "no win no fee" brigade from the local council estate who scrounge
benefits and look for any reason to get money.

"lenny" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:fb79tv$h39$(E-Mail Removed)...
> It will be interesting to see how this one plays out:
>
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...0&in_a_source=
>
> Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer, scientists believe
>

Dear Lenny,

I would have normally bothered to have read the link and responded, but as
it is the Daily Mail, which has been total b*******s during all my adult
life, I feel it is unlikely anything has changed and consequently their
report is not worth [further] serious consideration.

Try and cite a reliable journal next time.