Pete M Williams wrote in message
-rudnbXz4O-(E-Mail Removed):
> "Martin Underwood" <a@b> wrote in message
> news:44f45171$0$2670$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Clive wrote in message
>> (E-Mail Removed) om:
>
>
>> As a computer consultant who is sometimes called upon to recommend
>> an ISP to customers
>
> You're a Computer Consultant and yet you seem to have tied yourself
> into a sole provider due to its limited POP3 email and webspace.
> Surely as a consultant you should know better?
> I hope you do not have the same lack of foresight with any of your
> clients.
No. In the past when I've been asked to make a recommendation, I've
recommended Force 9 because, from my own experience, they've provided a good
service. Also, from my experience of other ISPs that customers have already
had, I've decided which ISPs I would not recommend.
Sadly, F9 is gradually moving from the "recommend wholeheartedly" to the
"don't recommend" category.
This shows that I'm prepared to be flexible and adjust my recommendation as
the ISPs' service changes.
What ISPs would other people recommend, using the following criteria:
- low cost (eg £15/month)
- broadband speed up to 8 Mbps
- high availability of connection and email/web servers
- good support (eg tracking of problem, technical knowledge, short downtime)
if anything does go wrong
- ideally, multiple/unlimited email addresses, of the form
<anything>@isp.net
Most of my customers will not require large monthly download (1-2 GB/month
is probably sufficient) or large web space (10 MB is probably sufficient).
Force 9 meets all those criteria - with the exception of reliability of
connection and servers... which is rather a critical one!