Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > OFDMA - PUSC - renumbering

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

OFDMA - PUSC - renumbering

 
 
karthikbalaguru
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-17-2008, 12:17 PM
Hi,

In the case of PUSC permutation mode of OFDMA, why do they adopt the
policy of renumbering ?
I searched the internet, but i do not find any specific link/doc that
talks about this in detail.
Any ideas ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Richard Clark
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-17-2008, 03:21 PM
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:17:48 -0800 (PST), karthikbalaguru
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>PUSC permutation mode of OFDMA


Hi Karthik,

I put the phrase above into Google and it gave me 606 links.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Reply With Quote
 
karthikbalaguru
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-21-2008, 08:09 AM
On Feb 17, 9:21*pm, Richard Clark <kb7...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:17:48 -0800 (PST), karthikbalaguru
>
> <karthikbalagur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >PUSC permutation mode of OFDMA

>
> Hi Karthik,
>
> I put the phrase above into Google and it gave me 606 links.
>


I got the info w.r.t PUSC permutation from http://ieee802.org/16 :-

I find that the PUSC permutation has
1) Outer Permutation and
2) Inner Permutation
Further, These permutations reduce interference .
Cross-interference between neighboring cells is reduced between
neighbouring cells,
w.r.t subchannels.

But, why have they opted for this renumbering scheme to introduce
permutation ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru
 
Reply With Quote
 
karthikbalaguru
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-21-2008, 08:13 AM
On Feb 21, 2:09*pm, karthikbalaguru <karthikbalagur...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Feb 17, 9:21*pm, Richard Clark <kb7...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:17:48 -0800 (PST), karthikbalaguru

>
> > <karthikbalagur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >PUSC permutation mode of OFDMA

>
> > Hi Karthik,

>
> > I put the phrase above into Google and it gave me 606 links.

>
> I got the info w.r.t PUSC permutation fromhttp://ieee802.org/16:-
>
> I find that the PUSC permutation has
> 1) Outer Permutation and
> 2) Inner Permutation
> Further, These permutations reduce interference .
> Cross-interference between neighboring cells is reduced between
> neighbouring cells,
> w.r.t subchannels.
>
> But, why have they opted for this renumbering scheme to introduce
> permutation ?
>


Thx. I got the answers.
I find my queries answered in http://ieee802.org/16 .

Karthik Balaguru
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WiMAX 802.16e Scalable OFDMA (SOFDMA) subcarrier frequency? app Wireless Internet 1 01-09-2008 09:16 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11