Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > O/T: Smartphone network choices for visitor to USA

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

O/T: Smartphone network choices for visitor to USA

 
 
miso
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-21-2012, 08:40 PM
On 1/21/2012 5:52 AM, George wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 12:31 AM, miso wrote:
>> On 1/17/2012 8:01 PM, who where wrote:
>>> It seems at least a couple of you guys are abreast of what's what in
>>> the USA at the moment for smartphone users, so I hope you can give us
>>> some advice.
>>>
>>> On a previous trip we have opted for cheap GSM burners on AT&T. This
>>> time around we will be visiting the western third of the states for 3
>>> months (Mar-Jun) and have iPhone 3GS phones which we intend to use.
>>>
>>> A plan isn't normally all that clever for transients. We are low
>>> volume voice/text users and presently use v.little data (current
>>> allowance is 50MB/month and that has never been threatened). I
>>> understand that in terms of coverage AT&T are ahead of T-mobile (tnx
>>> miso). So the question is really who has a pay-as-you-go (i.e.
>>> pre-paid, no doubt) deal that we should look into, including network
>>> resellers?

>>
>> In urban areas, T-Mob and AT&T are close. [I was shocked how good T-Mob
>> is in Philadelphia.] In some rural areas, T-mob is lacking if AT&T is
>> the only provider. Other areas AT&T and T-Mob both roam on say Cellular
>> One, so there is little difference. If you are going to the sticks in
>> the west, you probably want Verizon. I've contemplated getting a verizon
>> burner myself.

>
> I think Philly was Omnipoints (I think that was the name of the original
> company) pet city. A friend worked for them. They were based in NJ.
>
>
> It doesn't need to be a rural area. In general tmobile has the least
> amount of infrastructure. I don't live in a rural area and tmobile only
> has poor native coverage in the built up areas. When they dropped the
> att roaming the few people I knew who used tmobile moved on.
>
> I loved the fanciful att spin about "helpging rural people" to justify
> the buyout..
>
>>
>> I know T-mob has burners in Fry's, but all you want is the simcard. You
>> do know the iphone has this "no simcard issue." It is not the kind of
>> phone you want to change simcards on and depend on it working. It is
>> very touchy regarding the simcard insertion/removal. That didn't get
>> fixed on the iphone 4. I haven't heard if the 4S hard the same problem.
>>
>> I guess you've seen those phone kiosks in the states since you have been
>> here before. They sell simcards to visitors. I don't know much beyond
>> that. I had to buy a phone out of contract, had a lot of problems with
>> Craigslist sellers not completing deals, and ended up getting a good
>> deal at a local kiosk. The woman was a wiz with phone and simcards. She
>> unlocked my phone and plopped in an "international" simcard just to show
>> it was unlocked. I'm assuming you managed to unlock the 3G you are
>> bringing.
>>
>> I assume you also know about A-GPS issues.
>>
>> Which remind me. I'm going to send the T-Mob CEO a letter bitching about
>> no roaming on well established AT&T towers. They got their $3 billion
>> from the failed "merger", so start the roaming.
>>

>

T-Mobile didn't drop the AT&T roaming, at least where I have traveled.
In the bay area, it is generally a better network than AT&T. What T-mob
doesn't seem to be doing is adding AT&T roaming as AT&T extended their
network. I can "see" the AT&T towers using software on my phone. I know
people that get service. Pisses me off.

There are places where T-Mob and AT&T overlap, but maybe AT&T has one
more tower than T-Mob. Ft. Irwin in Ca for instance. But I can see why
T-Mob doesn't contract for just one tower. There would probably be cases
where unneeded roaming would be happening on that one tower.

There are also places where T-Mob has that one extra tower and AT&T
doesn't. But the edge is in favor of AT&T.

There are coverage maps on the net (gsmworld or something like that),
but they don't seem to be very accurate. I can tell you some of the AT&T
coverage is fiction. That is somebody submitted a projected coverage for
a tower, it got on the AT&T website, but the tower isn't active.

Ditto on Omnipoint, at least on the east coast. The guys at 2600 mag
used to hack it all the time.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
who where
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-25-2012, 12:33 AM
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:01:44 +0800, who where <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>It seems at least a couple of you guys are abreast of what's what in
>the USA at the moment for smartphone users, so I hope you can give us
>some advice.


Thanks for all the input to date. I will be following up on these
(and other) leads shortly.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Choices in Network network disappeared Bill Wireless Networks 1 10-17-2007 11:31 PM
MDA Vario smartphone and 802.11g network woes Tiny Tim Home Networking 0 11-07-2005 06:11 AM
Connecting Older Smartphone to local network to surf internet. tim@nocomment.com Wireless Internet 0 01-16-2005 12:01 AM
Notebook 802.11b choices pete Wireless Internet 1 10-06-2003 10:40 PM
wireless hardware choices Dave Wireless Internet 8 09-02-2003 12:01 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11