the superscope should take care the issue. However, I would just use class A or B instead of C.
Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
http://www.HowToNetworking.com
Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
http://www.ChicagoTech.net
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties.
Don't send e-mail or reply to me except you need consulting services. Posting on MS newsgroup will benefit all readers and you may get more help.
"Zonkwilliams" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news

D0675D7-DD1C-4E08-8389-(E-Mail Removed)...
I am currently managing a network with 250+ users, servers, and printers. I
am running a NT server that manges DNS. All of the IP's are static and I have
run out of available address's. I have set up a 2003 box that will run the
DNS & DHCP. The DNS will be step 1 with DHCP step 2. Since I will need to
create a new scope plus the scope of the static IP's I am a little confused.
The subnet on the static is 255.255.255.0 and I have been informed that to
create another scope that will be able to see the other scope the subnet will
have to be 255.255.254.0. But in 2003 there is a superscope which from what I
have read will manage a group of scopes under it. Will I be able to leave the
existing subnet at 24 and create a new scope also at 24 and still be able to
have the users see all of the network no matter which scope they are in?