No-NAT ADSL Router Recommendations?

Hi,

I have a No-NAT ADSL connection with 8 IP addresses.

Currently I'm using a Netgear DG834 broadband modem router with NAT
disabled, but it seems I have to still use a DMZ to get my server to be
accessible from the web. Something to do with the DG834 firewall still being
active with NAT switched off I believe.

Anyway, does anyone have any recommendations for an ADSL modem router that
will work well with No-NAT?

Thanks :-)

--
Rich

"Richard Moore" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:45d3716b.0@entanet...
> Hi,
>
> I have a No-NAT ADSL connection with 8 IP addresses.
>
> Currently I'm using a Netgear DG834 broadband modem router with NAT
> disabled, but it seems I have to still use a DMZ to get my server to be
> accessible from the web. Something to do with the DG834 firewall still being
> active with NAT switched off I believe.
>
> Anyway, does anyone have any recommendations for an ADSL modem router that
> will work well with No-NAT?
>
> Thanks :-)
>
> --
> Rich
>
I don't know if it is of any use, but if you've got a DG834 V3,
the latest firmware has a new option to disable the firewall
in addition to NAT.

"Mel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:45d38bac$0$97240$(E-Mail Removed) reenews.net...
>
> "Richard Moore" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:45d3716b.0@entanet...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a No-NAT ADSL connection with 8 IP addresses.
> >
> > Currently I'm using a Netgear DG834 broadband modem router with NAT
> > disabled, but it seems I have to still use a DMZ to get my server to be
> > accessible from the web. Something to do with the DG834 firewall still being
> > active with NAT switched off I believe.
> >
> > Anyway, does anyone have any recommendations for an ADSL modem router that
> > will work well with No-NAT?
> >
> > Thanks :-)
> >
> > --
> > Rich
> >
> I don't know if it is of any use, but if you've got a DG834 V3,
> the latest firmware has a new option to disable the firewall
> in addition to NAT.
>

Thinking about it, just adding a rule above the default to always
allow would achieve the same thing anyway, so please ignore my post.

"Mel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:45d38d8d$0$97244$(E-Mail Removed) reenews.net...
>
> "Mel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:45d38bac$0$97240$(E-Mail Removed) reenews.net...
>>
>> "Richard Moore" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:45d3716b.0@entanet...
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have a No-NAT ADSL connection with 8 IP addresses.
>> >
>> > Currently I'm using a Netgear DG834 broadband modem router with NAT
>> > disabled, but it seems I have to still use a DMZ to get my server to be
>> > accessible from the web. Something to do with the DG834 firewall still
>> > being
>> > active with NAT switched off I believe.
>> >
>> > Anyway, does anyone have any recommendations for an ADSL modem router
>> > that
>> > will work well with No-NAT?
>> >
>> > Thanks :-)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Rich
>> >
>> I don't know if it is of any use, but if you've got a DG834 V3,
>> the latest firmware has a new option to disable the firewall
>> in addition to NAT.
>>
>
> Thinking about it, just adding a rule above the default to always
> allow would achieve the same thing anyway, so please ignore my post.
>
>


Good idea but the only way to add an "Allow all incoming" rule is to specify
a destination LAN address. No good if there's multiple servers :-(

Might have to look at the V3, just checked and mine is V2.

--
Rich

"Rich" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:45d44893.0@entanet...
> "Mel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:45d38d8d$0$97244$(E-Mail Removed) reenews.net...
> >
> >
> > Thinking about it, just adding a rule above the default to always
> > allow would achieve the same thing anyway, so please ignore my post.
> >
> >
>
>
> Good idea but the only way to add an "Allow all incoming" rule is to specify
> a destination LAN address. No good if there's multiple servers :-(
>
> Might have to look at the V3, just checked and mine is V2.
>

I don't suppose they also added the same feature in the last V2 firmware
update?

Could it be done via telnet? Using iptables I assume (I'm not up on Linux )
To enable the dg834's telnet server:- http://192.168.0.1/?todo=debug

To disable it killall utelnetd (I think)

In article <45d3716b.0@entanet>, Richard Moore <(E-Mail Removed)>
writes
>Hi,
>
>I have a No-NAT ADSL connection with 8 IP addresses.
>
>Currently I'm using a Netgear DG834 broadband modem router with NAT
>disabled, but it seems I have to still use a DMZ to get my server to be
>accessible from the web. Something to do with the DG834 firewall still being
>active with NAT switched off I believe.
>
>Anyway, does anyone have any recommendations for an ADSL modem router that
>will work well with No-NAT?
>
>Thanks :-)
>
I use a Vigor 2800. it does NAT on the first IP address for general use
and passes my other 5 addresses through to the relevant servers.
It can be set up (default) so that your external addresses and internal
addresses can be setup on the same LAN cabling.
--
Bob Geddes