Gaz wrote:
> Kraftee wrote:
>> HVB wrote:
>>> On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:07:11 +0000, T i m wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was talking to a chap earlier who suggested he couldn't have
>>>> ADSL
>>>> from BT (who provide his telephone service) "because he is
>>>> connected
>>>> over fibre"? (in spite of this some of the online bb service
>>>> checkers
>>>> say he can have BB)?
>>>
>>> IIRC, BT installed fibre optic lines to some - usually remote -
>>> places
>>> to overcome distance/noise limitations of copper cabling. You'd
>>> have
>>> thought that this would be "the way of the future".
>>>
>>> Unfortunately for the chap to whom you refer, ADSL requires
>>> standard
>>> copper cabling, so if he really has a fibre line, he's scuppered.
>>
>> Not so remote, it was trialed in various areas across the country,
>> but BT have started to supply copper pairs to the local cabs as
>> well
>> as the fibre link, In most cases the copper is there it's just
>> been
>> ring fenced for services which couldn't be carried by the fibre &
>> then DSL came along which wasn't included in such services.
>
> Indeed, the estate i live on, built only within the last few years
> has fibre primarily. When my property was near complete, having done
> a bit of research, I found that as you say, copper was laid as well,
> mainly for services like burglar alarms etc, I badgered BT several
> times and I was succesful in getting a copper wire onto my line.
>
> Broadband blokey came to check the line would work with broadband,
> he
> said the numbers where very high, but it should work, technically it
> was outside the spec for broadband, and if it had any problems, bt
> would just stop the service...
>
> Well, here I am two years later, now on 1mb download.........
The limits have dropped over the last couple of years, when DSL was
first released they were a little on the conservative side but have
been grdaully relaxed over the years..
|