Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > NLB w/Intel Teaming and two Cisco 2621 Switches

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

NLB w/Intel Teaming and two Cisco 2621 Switches

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?UGV0ZXIgVy4=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-29-2003, 01:36 PM
I am running two Microsoft Windows 2003 Servers with both
an Intel PRO/1000 dual port server and dual port network
adapter (four ports in all). I also have two Cisco 2621
switches that are divided into two segments. One segment is
internal and one is external.

I have configured Teaming on the adapters such that port
one of the server adapter is Teamed with port one of the
network adapter and port two to port two. I have also
configured the preferred primary adapters such that there
is a preferred primary running on each physical adapter.
On the internal team I am running Adaptive Load Balancing
Mode and on the external team I am running Adaptive Fault
Tolerance Mode. IN PREVIOUS TEST MS NLB WORKED IN THE
Adaptive Fault Tolerance Mode, BUT WOULD NOT WORK PROPERLY
IN Adaptive Load Balancing Mode with our configuration. By
the way, I am running the 10/28/03 adapter drivers and
PROSet 8.3.0.0.

MS NLB has been configured for the external adapter as
follows: THESE ARE NOT THE ACTUAL IP ADDRESSES - SUBNET
MASK FOR ALL IPs 255.255.255.192

Also, cluster operation mode is set to multicast.

68.251.25.85 - Dedicated Server #1 - No Load Balancing
68.251.25.86 - Dedicated Server #2 - No Load Balancing
68.251.25.89 - Cluster Master
68.251.25.90 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
68.251.25.91 - Single Host w/Preferenced to Server #2
68.251.25.92 - Single Host w/Preferenced to Server #2
68.251.25.93 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
68.251.25.94 - Single Host w/Preferenced to Server #2
68.251.25.96 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
68.251.25.97 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
68.251.25.98 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
68.251.25.99 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None

For completeness the following IPs are also running on the
external adapter, but are not load balanced.
172.18.8.x - 255.255.254.0
172.18.9.x - 255.255.254.0

PROBLEM: Initially the configuration works properly. You
can remotely connect to any or all of the NLB addresses.
But, at some later time, I don't know how much later, none
of the NLB addresses can be reached remotely.

I have been at this for weeks. Does anyone have an idea of
what the problem might be. Could it be something with the
switches or mac address problems?

Thanks in advance.

Peter W.


Upon further reading, I realized that Adaptive Load Balancing
was not the correct team type for my configuration. I have two
sites Production and Development or Test. In Production I have
two switches and in Development I have one. NLB was tested in
the Development environment. I changed my Production team
type to Switch Fault Tolerance and the problem still exists.

If anyone has any ideas feel free to chime in.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Marc Reynolds [MSFT]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-30-2003, 02:16 AM
Teaming NICs and NLB often don't work together very well.
See 278431 INFO: Using NIC Teaming Adapters with Network Load Balancing May
Cause
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=278431

--

Thanks,
Marc Reynolds
Microsoft Technical Support

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


"Peter W." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:E7F0EF8A-266C-4E68-99D6-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I am running two Microsoft Windows 2003 Servers with both
> an Intel PRO/1000 dual port server and dual port network
> adapter (four ports in all). I also have two Cisco 2621
> switches that are divided into two segments. One segment is
> internal and one is external.
>
> I have configured Teaming on the adapters such that port
> one of the server adapter is Teamed with port one of the
> network adapter and port two to port two. I have also
> configured the preferred primary adapters such that there
> is a preferred primary running on each physical adapter.
> On the internal team I am running Adaptive Load Balancing
> Mode and on the external team I am running Adaptive Fault
> Tolerance Mode. IN PREVIOUS TEST MS NLB WORKED IN THE
> Adaptive Fault Tolerance Mode, BUT WOULD NOT WORK PROPERLY
> IN Adaptive Load Balancing Mode with our configuration. By
> the way, I am running the 10/28/03 adapter drivers and
> PROSet 8.3.0.0.
>
> MS NLB has been configured for the external adapter as
> follows: THESE ARE NOT THE ACTUAL IP ADDRESSES - SUBNET
> MASK FOR ALL IPs 255.255.255.192
>
> Also, cluster operation mode is set to multicast.
>
> 68.251.25.85 - Dedicated Server #1 - No Load Balancing
> 68.251.25.86 - Dedicated Server #2 - No Load Balancing
> 68.251.25.89 - Cluster Master
> 68.251.25.90 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
> 68.251.25.91 - Single Host w/Preferenced to Server #2
> 68.251.25.92 - Single Host w/Preferenced to Server #2
> 68.251.25.93 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
> 68.251.25.94 - Single Host w/Preferenced to Server #2
> 68.251.25.96 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
> 68.251.25.97 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
> 68.251.25.98 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
> 68.251.25.99 - Multiple Host w/Affinity set to None
>
> For completeness the following IPs are also running on the
> external adapter, but are not load balanced.
> 172.18.8.x - 255.255.254.0
> 172.18.9.x - 255.255.254.0
>
> PROBLEM: Initially the configuration works properly. You
> can remotely connect to any or all of the NLB addresses.
> But, at some later time, I don't know how much later, none
> of the NLB addresses can be reached remotely.
>
> I have been at this for weeks. Does anyone have an idea of
> what the problem might be. Could it be something with the
> switches or mac address problems?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Peter W.
>
>
> Upon further reading, I realized that Adaptive Load Balancing
> was not the correct team type for my configuration. I have two
> sites Production and Development or Test. In Production I have
> two switches and in Development I have one. NLB was tested in
> the Development environment. I changed my Production team
> type to Switch Fault Tolerance and the problem still exists.
>
> If anyone has any ideas feel free to chime in.
>



 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I am looking to buy Cisco, Lucent, Nortel, Alcatel, JuniperNetworks, Bintec, Siemens, Foundry, Networks, Extreme Networks, Fore/Marconi,Tellabs Lucent/Avaya/Ascend, Xylogics, Brocade, Intel, Motorola, NokiaVPN/Firewall, Netscreen, Microsoft Adobe, C buynetworks@gmail.com Broadband 0 03-09-2008 01:36 PM
I am looking to buy Cisco, Lucent, Nortel, Alcatel, JuniperNetworks, Bintec, Siemens, Foundry, Networks, Extreme Networks, Fore/Marconi,Tellabs Lucent/Avaya/Ascend, Xylogics, Brocade, Intel, Motorola, NokiaVPN/Firewall, Netscreen, Microsoft Adobe, C buynetworks@gmail.com Linux Networking 0 03-09-2008 09:11 AM
Intel 2200BG in Linux && WPA with CKIP (Cisco Compatibility TKIP) Matthias Apitz Linux Networking 0 09-22-2006 08:07 AM
Cisco 1720 Router and and 2950 Switches Xlat Windows Networking 0 06-01-2006 02:00 PM
Cisco Routers and Switches for Sale CK Network Routers 0 10-19-2004 10:58 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11