String wrote:
>> But theirs applies each month, rather than only if you go over for
>> three months, so is more draconian :-)
>>
>> They also only seem to have one limit - 50GB, which is better than
>> the cheapest PN one, equal to the second choice PN one (for £3 per
>> month less than PN charge for that).
>>
>> They would work out more expensive than any of the higher PN ones,
>> since extra costs 99p/GB, while to have one of the higher PN ones
>> will cost an extra 40p/GB - but only in 25GB chunks. (so 75GB is
>> £39.99 with PN, would be £25.99 + £24.75 = £50.74 with Nildram)
>>
>> The Nildram unmetered time is slightly better than PN too, being
>> midnight - 8:00am, rather than 1:00am - 8:00am.
>>
>> So which is better is going to depend very much on just what you
>> want.
>
>
> Nicer package but the reason i migrated from nildram and the reason i
> wont migrate back to them despite being utterly furious at plusnet is
> nildram still charge an extortionate amount for a static IP and even
> more for a subnet.
>
> --
Ive just migrated to Nildram and the guy on the phone was saying about the
new cap, this is why I moved, I want a responsible ISP who does somthing
about leechers, so my connection doesnt suffer, plus i get 2mb for the price
of 512k which is nice, currently my ISP takes on all the bandwidth hogs and
good luck to them, but gaming was utterly useless on my old ISP.
I go live in 10 days
He also said the ones who are leaving are the ones costing Nildram money, so
its no loss
50Gb a month is loads, and as it carries over I cannot see a reason for
going over this, unlike the BT one at 15Gb.