Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Linux Networking > NFS server performace issue

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

NFS server performace issue

 
 
Viper
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-28-2004, 01:23 AM
Hi,
We are having some rather strange issues with NFS and SuSe 9.0 (kernel
2.4.21). We have the kernel NFS server setup with 24 threads on a file
server that is used in a 174 node beowulf cluster. The file server has a
single AMD opteron 2 gig's ram, and a 1 TB 3ware raid array. When doing
rpc's from the storage server to nodes nfs seems to stop responding or
respond very slowly. Network bandwidth is not being exhausted. Could this be
thread contention on the server? Or would jumbo frames help this situation.
I would welcome any experiences with a setup such as this. Thanks.

-=>Adam<=-


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-28-2004, 01:50 PM
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Viper wrote:
> Hi,
> We are having some rather strange issues with NFS and SuSe 9.0 (kernel
> 2.4.21). We have the kernel NFS server setup with 24 threads on a file
> server that is used in a 174 node beowulf cluster. The file server has a


Err, do you see the problem here? 24 threads for 174 clients? I have a
couple of 2TB systems serving only about 20 nodes, and I've got 256
threads on each of those. There's very little penalty in cranking up
the number of nfsd threads.

> single AMD opteron 2 gig's ram, and a 1 TB 3ware raid array. When doing
> rpc's from the storage server to nodes nfs seems to stop responding or
> respond very slowly. Network bandwidth is not being exhausted. Could this be
> thread contention on the server? Or would jumbo frames help this situation.
> I would welcome any experiences with a setup such as this. Thanks.


Look at the output of 'cat /proc/net/rpc/nfsd', specifically the line
starting with "th", e.g.:

th 256 846 2641.140 1033.620 444.270 196.350 123.210 54.990 36.530 27.830 19.010 32.410

The first number is the number of threads. The second number is the number
of times all the threads have been busy and the server has head to deny
I/O requests. After that, each number is the amount of time X% of the
threads have been busy simultaneously, with X being 10, 20, 30... That
server got bumped from 128 to 256 threads without being rebooted, so
the stats didn't get reset. The 846 was there before I moved to 256,
and hasn't increased since. Ideally, you want the number to be zero as
well as the last few numbers.

--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VERY slow network performace over wan fc9a9f82-2129692850@news.postalias Windows Networking 5 04-29-2007 11:04 PM
No logon server available - Windows 2003 Trust Issue? NS Issue? newsgroups.jd@gmail.com Windows Networking 15 08-21-2006 07:38 PM
Slow network performace accessing shared folders Steve Windows Networking 2 06-24-2004 02:40 PM
poor Win client performace with Samba Marc Williams Linux Networking 2 01-19-2004 11:16 PM
Performace increase di-614+ rev A Kim Wireless Internet 1 10-23-2003 12:23 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11